Cited by 94Children's Physical and Motor DevelopmentPhysical Activity and HealthPhysical Education and Training Studies

Physical Fitness Differences Between Prepubescent Boys and Girls

Open access
Marta, Carlos C., Marinho, Daniel A., Barbosa, Tiago M., Izquierdo, Mikel, Marques, Mário C.·2012·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze in which physical capabilities boys and girls are closer or distant. An additional objective was to find which of the body fat, physical activity, and somatotype factors have a greater effect on prepubescent children's physical fitness. This was a cross-sectional study involving 312 children (10.8 ± 0.4 years). The physical fitness assessment employed sets of aerobic fitness, strength, flexibility, speed, agility, and balance. The boys presented higher values in all selected tests, except tests of balance and flexibility, in which girls scored better. Gender differences in the physical fitness were greatest in the explosive strength of upper (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.09) and lower limbs (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.08), although with a medium-size effect of gender, and smaller in the abdominal (p > 0.05, η(p)(2) = 0.007) and upper limbs (p > 0.05, η(p)(2) = 0.003) muscular endurance, and trunk extensor strength and flexibility (p > 0.05, η(p)(2) = 0.001). The endomorphic (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.26) in the girls, and the ectomorphic (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.31) and mesomorphic (p ≤ 0.01, η(p)(2) = 0.26) in the boys, had the high-sized effect on the physical fitness. The physical activity in the girls, and the endomorphic and body fat in the boys, did not have a significant effect. These findings can help in the planning of activities that take into account the success and motivation of both boys and girls and thus increase levels of physical activity and physical fitness at school. However, in prepubescent children, one cannot neglect the influence of genetic determinism, observed from the morphoconstitutional point of view.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31825bb4aa

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Boys and girls demonstrate differences in a range of physical characteristics, including body composition and skinfold thickness, height, and explosive strength, even before puberty, suggesting that sex chromosome composition plays a role in determining differences in adult athletic performance.

    “Boys and girls demonstrate differences in a range of physical characteristics, including body composition and skinfold thickness [64], height, and explosive strength, even before puberty [65], suggesting that sex chromosome composition plays a role in determining differences in adult athletic performance.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 94

Authors
Marta, C. C., Marinho, D. A., Barbosa, T. M., Izquierdo, M., & Marques, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Politécnica da Guarda (PT)
  • University of Beira Interior (PT)
  • Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT)
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2012-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1756-1766
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016623472
Cited by
94
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
physical fitness, sex differences, prepubertal children, fat mass, physical activity, somatotype, endomorphy, muscular endurance, explosive strength, flexibility, balance, agility, cardiorespiratory fitness, genetic determinism
MeSH terms
Abdominal Muscles, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Motor Skills, Physical Fitness, Sex Factors, Skinfold Thickness, Somatotypes, Range of Motion, Articular, Statistics, Nonparametric, Upper Extremity, Lower Extremity, Body Size, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review