Cited by 50Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

EFFECT OF CREATINE PHOSPHATE SUPPLEMENTATION ON ANAEROBIC WORKING CAPACITY AND BODY WEIGHT AFTER TWO AND SIX DAYS OF LOADING IN MEN AND WOMEN

Eckerson, Joan M., Stout, Jeffrey R., Moore, Geri A., Stone, Nancy J., Iwan, Kate A., Gebauer, Amy N., Ginsberg, Rachelle·2005·The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of 2 and 6 days of creatine phosphate loading on anaerobic working capacity (AWC) and body weight (BW) in men and women. Sixty-one men (n = 31) and women (n = 30) randomly received 1 of 3 treatments (4 x 5 g.d(-1) x 6 days) using a double blind design: (a) 18 g dextrose as placebo (PL); (b) 5.0 g Cr + 20 g dextrose (Cr); or (c) 5.0 g Cr + 18 g dextrose + 4 g of sodium and potassium phosphates (CrP). AWC was determined at baseline and following 2 and 6 days of supplementation using the Critical Power Test. BW increased significantly over time, and the mean value for the men was significantly greater compared to that for women, but there were no interactions (p > 0.05). There were gender-specific responses for AWC expressed in both absolute values (kJ) and relative to BW (kJ. kg(-1)), with the women demonstrating no significant interactions. For the men, CrP loading significantly increased AWC following 2 days (23.8%) and 6 days (49.8%) of supplementation vs. PL (kJ and kJ.kg(-1)). Cr supplementation increased AWC 13-15% in both genders compared to PL (1.1%- 3.0% decline); although this result was not statistically significant, it may have some practical significance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/r-16924.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-ingesting creatine monohydrate with HMB, beta-alanine, phosphates, or alpha-lipoic acid may have some additive effects.

    “Several studies have also indicated that co-ingesting CM with other potentially ergogenic nutrients such as beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) (Jowko et al. 2001), beta-alanine (Hoffman et al. 2006), phosphates (Eckerson et al. 2005), and alpha-lipoic acid (Burke et al. 2003b) may have some additive effects.”

    From Analysis of the efficacy, safety, and regulatory status of novel forms of creatine (2011) · cites this paper as Eckerson et al. 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eckerson, J. M., Stout, J. R., Moore, G. A., Stone, N. J., Iwan, K. A., Gebauer, A. N., & Ginsberg, R.
Affiliations
  • Creighton University (US)
  • Florida Atlantic University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2005
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
756
ISSN
  • 1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4287
OpenAlex
W1964720379
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
creatine loading, body weight, sex differences, phosphate, dextrose placebo
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Body Weight, Cardiotonic Agents, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Phosphocreatine, Sex Factors, Anaerobic Threshold, Ergometry, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review