A test of the auricular surface aging technique
Abstract
A recently developed technique used in the estimation of age at death is based upon the metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium. This technique was designed to be used in seriation to estimate the age distribution of a skeletal sample. However, the technique has also been used in forensic science cases, which must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. The present study examines the use of the auricular surface technique as the single aging factor. Two hypotheses are tested using a sample of 189 individuals drawn from the Terry Collection, housed at the Smithsonian Institution. The hypotheses are (1) is the method equally applicable across race and sex, and (2) how well does the method perform as the single aging factor? The results indicate that the amount of degenerative change in the auricular surface is not dependent upon race or sex in any given age category. However, the rate of degenerative change is too variable to be used as a single criterion for the estimation of age; the range of estimation error is simply too large for forensic science purposes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The auricular surface is regarded as a good age indicator because its morphology is independent of population affinity or sex; therefore, an estimate of an individual's age-at-death can be made without knowledge of their population affinity or sex.
“The auricular surface is regarded as a good age indicator because its morphology is independent of population affinity or sex; therefore, an estimate of an individual's age‐at‐death can be made without knowledge of their population affinity or sex [16, 36].”
From Three methods of estimating age‐at‐death using three different regions on the os coxa (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Three methods of estimating age‐at‐death using three different regions on the os coxa
Mkhonza, S. S., Ngubane, N. P., Aladeyelu, O. S., & Rennie, C. O. (2026) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.70219
- Authors
- Murray, K., & Murray, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Arkansas 1 Forensic osteologist, Department of Anthropology, and distinguished professor, Department of Economics , respectively, , Fayetteville, AR72701 .
- Venue
- Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- ASTM International
- Published
- 1991-07-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1162-1169
- ISSN
- 0022-1198
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review