The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Typing of Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Extracted from Compact Bone from Human Remains
Abstract
The application of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) typing methods for the potential identification of unknown human remains was investigated. DNA was isolated from compact bone tissue from badly decomposed bodies and from known and unknown human remains, using a decalcification and ion wash procedure. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) loci yielded results in some cases, but more often the DNA was too degraded to produce RFLP patterns. No RFLP profiles could be obtained from putrified soft tissues. However, DNA extracted from compact bone tissue of human remains up to eleven years old was successfully amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the VNTR loci D1S80, D17S5, COL2A1, and APO B, as well as the HLA-DQ alpha locus. This is especially significant, since PCR results were obtained from those samples whose DNA had been degraded substantially and had yielded no RFLP patterns. All DNA types determined from the compact bone tissue from decomposed bodies whose identification had been established first by other means (and whose parents or offspring were available for typing) demonstrated mendelian inheritance of the alleles of the loci analyzed. These results suggest that amplification and typing of DNA extracted from compact bone of human remains could be useful in establishing the identity of a person, as well as in excluding possible false identifications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
Cited by
Use of bleach to eliminate contaminating DNA from the surface of bones and teeth
Kemp, B. M., & Smith, D. G. (2005) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.017 · Cited by 321
DNA Extraction Strategies for Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis
Comey, C., Koons, B., Presley, K., Smerick, J., Sobieralski, C., Stanley, D., & Baechtel, F. (1994) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1520/jfs13711j · Cited by 265
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hochmeister, M., Budowle, B., Borer, U., Eggmann, U., Comey, C., & Dirnhofer, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- ASTM International
- Published
- 1991-11-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1649-1661
- ISSN
- 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1500941590
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Typing of Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Extracted from Compact Bone from Human Remains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1520/jfs13189j
- The paper
- Hochmeister, M., Budowle, B., Borer, U., Eggmann, U., Comey, C., & Dirnhofer, R. (1991). Typing of Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Extracted from Compact Bone from Human Remains. Journal of Forensic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs13189j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.