Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Presenting Three-Dimensional Forensic Facial Simulations on the Internet Using VRML

Evison, MP, Green, MA·1999·Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract

Advances in graphical computing have led to the development of computerized simulation models for forensic facial reconstruction in three dimensions. As well as being rapid and repeatable, computerization also offers a flexible means of presenting finished reconstructions. Here we describe the presentation of virtual images of plastic reconstructions on the Internet using virtual reality modeling language (VRML) and the enhancement of the final images using a commercially available three-dimensional editing program. The Internet offers an additional medium for presenting images to the public which will complement the traditional methods. International round-the-clock accessibility to images is gained, combined with the facility to interact freely with the reconstruction in three dimensions. Use of the Internet will also facilitate an efficient internationally available service for computerized forensic facial reconstruction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1520/jfs14590j

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Progress in computer science and improvements to medical imaging technologies have led to the development of computer systems for forensic facial reconstruction or for three-dimensional modelling of facial ageing using longitudinal and cross-sectional data.

    “Progress in computer science and improvements to medical imaging technologies have led to the development of computer systems for forensic facial reconstruction [21,22] or for three-dimensional modelling of facial ageing using longitudinal [23,24] and cross-sectional data [25].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Vanezis, 1989, Application of 3-D computer graphics for facial reconstruction and comparison with sculpting techniques, Forensic Sci Int, 42, 69, 10.1016/0379-0738(89)90200-4 · DOI
  2. Ubelaker, 1992, Computer assisted facial reconstruction, J Forensic Sci, 37, 155, 10.1520/JFS13223J · DOI
  3. Tyrrell, 1997, Forensic three-dimensional facial reconstruction: historical review and contemporary developments, J Forensic Sci, 42, 653, 10.1520/JFS14176J · DOI
  4. Helmer, 1984, Schädelidentifizierung durch elektronische Bildmischung
  5. Nelson L A . The potential use of computed tomography scans for the collection of craniofacial soft tissue depth data (M.Sc. dissertation, unpublished). Sheffield, University of Sheffield1995.
  6. Prag, 1997, Making faces: using forensic and archaeological evidence
  7. Hjalgrim, 1995, Stereolithography: potential applications in anthropological studies, Am J Phys Anthropol, 97, 329, 10.1002/ajpa.1330970307 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Evison, M., & Green, M.
Affiliations
The University of Sheffield, The Medico-Legal Center 1 Department of Forensic Pathology, , Sheffield, S3 7ES, United Kingdom .
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
1999-11-01
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1219-1223
ISSN
0022-1198
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review