The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interpolating Between Computerized Three-Dimensional Forensic Facial Simulations
Abstract
The shape of the skull is a limited predictor of facial appearance and facial reconstruction methods can offer at best a resemblance to the individual during life. Various unknown factors in addition to those relating to age, build, obesity, ethnic group, and the varying shape of the eyes, nose, and mouth mean that a variety of facial reconstructions could be produced from any single skull. A disadvantage of both traditional “plastic” facial reconstruction methods and existing computerized equivalents is that the finished reconstruction is fixed and substantial further work is required if a modified outcome is to be presented. An advantage of computerization is that if offers a greater potential for easy revision of images. Here we describe a method for interpolating or “morphing” between virtual images of facial reconstructions produced using the “plastic” technique which enables the interactive fattening of the face in three dimensions. Morphing is achieved using qmorf, a demonstration program, and using the interpolator node of virtual reality modeling language (VRML).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Progress in computer science and improvements to medical imaging technologies have led to the development of computer systems for forensic facial reconstruction or for three-dimensional modelling of facial ageing using longitudinal and cross-sectional data.
“Progress in computer science and improvements to medical imaging technologies have led to the development of computer systems for forensic facial reconstruction [21,22] or for three-dimensional modelling of facial ageing using longitudinal [23,24] and cross-sectional data [25].”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Tyrrell, 1997, Forensic three-dimensional facial reconstruction: historical review and contemporary developments, J Forensic Sci, 42, 653, 10.1520/JFS14176J · DOI
- Prag, 1997, Making faces: using forensic and archaeological evidence
- Lebedinskaya, 1993, Principles of facial reconstruction, 183
- Fedosyutkin, 1993, The relationship of skull morphology to facial features, 199
- Vanezis, 1989, Application of 3-D computer graphics for facial reconstruction and comparison with sculpting techniques, Forensic Sci Int, 42, 69, 10.1016/0379-0738(89)90200-4 · DOI
- Ubelaker, 1992, Gomputer assisted facial reconstruction, J Forensic Sci, 37, 155, 10.1520/JFS13223J · DOI
- Ames, 1997, VRML 2.0 sourcebook
- Farkas, 1994, Anthropometry of the head and face
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koudelová, J., Hoffmannová, E., Dupej, J., & Velemínská, J. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212618 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, M., & Evison, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sheffield, The Medico-Legal Centre 1 Department of Forensic Pathology, , Sheffield, S3 7ES, United Kingdom .
- Venue
- Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- ASTM International
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1224-1228
- ISSN
- 0022-1198
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review