The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Obsessional Harassment and Erotomania in a Criminal Court Population
Abstract
The criminal behaviors of harassment and menacing are difficult to control, and of increasing concern to the general public and local law enforcement officials. In 1992, the New York State Legislature modified the Penal Law, responding to public fears and concerns that stalking behavior may become violent. Some persons charged with these types of offenses are suffering from psychiatric disorders. Among these disorders are those classified as Delusional Disorders. According to both DSM-III-R (1987–1993) and DSM-IV (1994), there are five specific types of Delusional Disorder: erotomanic, grandiose, jealous, persecutory and somatic. This type of disorder tends to be chronic. Forty eight cases of persons charged with harassment and menacing in the New York County Criminal and Supreme Court and referred for evaluation to the Forensic Psychiatry Clinic between January 1987 and January 1994 are reviewed. When cases of erotomania and other affectionate/amorous complaints were compared with persecutory/angry forms of harassing behavior, there was a great deal of similarity. When all harassers were compared to the Clinic population as a whole, major differences in ethnicity, age, educational level and sex were noted. Findings are presented regarding incidence, other demographic data, recidivism, violence and clinical diagnosis. The researchers conclude that erotomania does exist, however, there are other psychiatric disorders which can also be diagnosed in individuals accused of harassing and menacing behavior. From the point of view of the victim and the criminal justice system, the similarities in behavior patterns are more important than the different diagnoses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mullen, P. E., Path纯, M., Purcell, R., & Stuart, G. W. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.8.1244 · Cited by 441
The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature
Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2007) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.05.001 · Cited by 382
Prevalence of Partner Abuse: Rates of Emotional Abuse and Control
Carney, M. M., & Barner, J. R. (2012) · Partner Abuse · doi:10.1891/1946-6560.3.3.286 · Cited by 184
(2003) · PubMed · Cited by 118
Identifying risk factors in stalking: A review of current research
McEwan, T., Mullen, P. E., & Purcell, R. (2007) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.03.005 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Harmon, R., Rosner, R., & Owens, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- ASTM International
- Published
- 1995-03-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 188-196
- ISSN
- 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1555602166
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Obsessional Harassment and Erotomania in a Criminal Court Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1520/jfs15339j
- The paper
- Harmon, R., Rosner, R., & Owens, H. (1995). Obsessional Harassment and Erotomania in a Criminal Court Population. Journal of Forensic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs15339j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.