Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Research Review of Public Figure Threats, Approaches, Attacks, and Assassinations in the United States

Meloy, JR, James, DV, Farnham, FR, Mullen, PE, Pathe, M, Darnley, B, Preston, L·2004·Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract

The authors review extant research on threats, approaches, attacks, and assassinations of public figures in the United States. Despite the limited number of studies, data exist concerning: 1) threatening letters and approaches to celebrities; 2) attacks and assassinations of public figures, usually the President of the United States; 3) threats and approaches to legislative members of state and federal governments; and 4) threats, approaches, and attacks against federal judicial officials. Similarities and differences across the various studies are discussed. Consistent findings across the studies indicate that direct threats toward the target are unusual and are often correlated negatively with an approach or attack; a significant proportion of subjects are mentally ill and have criminal histories; many subjects evidenced a downward spiral in their lives in the months or year before their approach or attack; and if an attack occurred, it was predatory (instrumental, premeditated) rather than affective (emotional, reactive), and the weapon of choice was a firearm, usually a handgun. Operational guidance and further research recommendations are made.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1520/jfs2004102

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Dietz, 1991, Threatening and otherwise inappropriate lettersto Hollywood celebrities, J Forensic Sci, 36, 185, 10.1520/JFS13019J · DOI
  2. Dietz, 1991, Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to members of the United States Congress, J Forensic Sci, 36, 1445, 10.1520/JFS13165J · DOI
  3. Meloy, 1998, The psychology of stalking: clinical and forensic perspectives, 10.1016/B978-012490560-3/50020-7 · DOI
  4. Mullen, 2000, Stalkers and their victims, 10.1017/CBO9781139106863 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Spitzberg, 2002, The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3, 261, 10.1177/1524838002237330 · DOI
  6. Clarke, 1982, American assassins: the darker side of politics
  7. Clarke, 1990, On being mad or merely angry
  8. Rothstein, 1964, Presidential assassination syndrome, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 11, 245, 10.1001/archpsyc.1964.01720270017003 · DOI
  9. Megargee, 1986, A psychometric study of incarcerated Presidential threateners, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 243, 10.1177/0093854886013003001 · DOI
  10. Hoffman, 1943, Psychotic visitors to government offices in the National Capitol, Am J Psychiatry, 99, 571, 10.1176/ajp.99.4.571 · DOI
  11. Sebastiani, 1965, Psychotic visitors to the White House, Am J Psychiatry, 122, 679, 10.1176/ajp.122.6.679 · DOI
  12. Shore, 1985, White House cases: psychiatric patients and the Secret Service, Am J Psychiatry, 142, 308, 10.1176/ajp.142.3.308 · DOI
  13. Rothstein, 1966, Presidential assassination syndrome II: Application to Lee Harvey Oswald, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 15, 260, 10.1001/archpsyc.1966.01730150036006 · DOI
  14. Rothstein, 1971, Presidential assassination syndrome: A psychiatric study of the threat, the deed, and the message, 161
  15. Freedman, 1971, Psychopathology of assassination, 143
  16. Fein, 1995, Threat assessment: An approach to prevent targeted violence. (NCJ 155000)
  17. Fein, 1998, Preventing attacks on public officials and public figures: a Secret Service perspective, 175, 10.1016/B978-012490560-3/50028-1 · DOI
  18. Fein, 1999, Assassination in the United States: an operational study of recent assassins, attackers, and near-lethal approachers, J Forensic Sci, 44, 321, 10.1520/JFS14457J · DOI
  19. Meloy, 1992, Violent attachments
  20. Meloy, 2001, Communicated threats and violence toward public and private targets: discerning differences among those who stalk and attack, J Forensic Sci, 46, 1211, 10.1520/JFS15122J · DOI
  21. Hempel, 1999, Offender and offense characteristics of a nonrandom sample of mass murderers, J Am Acad Psychiatry and the Law, 27, 213
  22. Meloy, 2001, Offender and offense characteristics of a nonrandom sample of adolescent mass murderers, J Am Acad Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 719, 10.1097/00004583-200106000-00018 · DOI
  23. Monahan, 2001, Rethinking risk assessment, 10.1093/oso/9780195138825.001.0001 · DOI
  24. Scalora, 2003, The relationship of mental illness to targeted contact behavior toward state government agencies and officials, Beh Sciences and the Law, 21, 239, 10.1002/bsl.525 · DOI
  25. Scalora, 2002, An epidemiological assessment of problematic contacts to members of Congress, J Forensic Sci, 47, 1, 10.1520/JFS15575J · DOI
  26. Scalora, 2002, Risk factors for approach behavior toward the U.S. Congress, J Threat Assessment, 2, 35, 10.1300/J177v02n02_03 · DOI
  27. Coggins, 1996, Mental health clinicians' attitudes about reporting threats against the President, Psychiatr Services, 47, 832, 10.1176/ps.47.8.832 · DOI
  28. Calhoun, 1998, Hunters and howlers: threats and violence against federal judicial officials in the United States, 1789–1993
  29. Borum, 1999, Threat assessment: defining an approach for evaluating risk of targeted violence, Behav Sci Law, 17, 323, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199907/09)17:3<323::AID-BSL349>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Meloy, Jr., James, D., Farnham, F., Mullen, P., Pathe, M., Darnley, B., & Preston, L.
Affiliations
  • Forensis, Inc. 1 , P.O. Box 90699, San Diego, CA
  • North London Forensic Service 2 , The Ridgeway, Enfield EN2 8JL, UK
  • North London Forensic Service 3 , The Ridgeway, Enfield EN2 8JL, UK
  • Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health 4 , Fairfield, Victoria3078Australia
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital 5 , Victoria3050Australia
  • North London Forensic Service 6 , The Ridgeway, Enfield EN2 8JL, UK
  • North London Forensic Service 7 , The Ridgeway, Enfield EN2 8JL, UK
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2004-09-01
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
JFS2004102-8
ISSN
0022-1198
Cited by
46
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.