The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Definition for Asbestos
Abstract
The authors present a definition for asbestos, based in part on discussions held during a workshop on this subject.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The regulated definition of asbestos fibre excludes several other fibrous minerals that may possess an asbestiform habitus but do not exhibit all of the properties of asbestos, such as sepiolite, erionite and nemolite6.”
From Evaluation of the genotoxic and transformation potential induced by asbestos compared to cleavage fragments (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Hodgson, 1979, Asbestos
- Mumpton, F. A. and Thompson, C. S., Clays and Clay Minerals 0009-8604, Vol. 23, 1975, pp. 131–143. · DOI
- Champness, P. E., Lorimer, G. W., and Cliff, G., Journal of Microscopy 0022-2720, Vol. 109, 1976, pp. 231–249. · DOI
- Miller, J. L., Norelco Reporter 0029-1625, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1978, pp. 1–11.
- Wicks, 1979, Mineralogical Techniques of Asbestos Determination
- Leake, B. E., American Mineralogist 0003-004X, Vol. 63, 1978, pp. 1023–1052.
- Papike, J. J. and Ross, M., American Mineralogist 0003-004X, Vol. 55, 1970, pp. 1945–1972.
- Berry, 1974, Selected Powder Diffraction Data for Minerals
Cited by
Sorted by citations
La Maestra, S., Militello, G. M., Alberti, S., Benvenuti, M., & Gaggero, L. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-86325-z · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross, M., Kuntze, R., & Clifton, R.
- Venue
- Definitions for Asbestos and Other Health-Related Silicates
- Published
- 1984-01-01
- Pages
- 139-147
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review