Using acceptance and commitment therapy techniques to enhance treatment engagement in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder
Abstract
Evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are available for veterans, but many do not benefit due to low treatment engagement. This may be partially due to avoidance behaviors characteristic of individuals with PTSD. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a transdiagnostic treatment approach that aims to reduce avoidance. The authors propose the use of adjunctive ACT techniques to enhance engagement with treatment for PTSD. ACT techniques such as cognitive defusion and values clarification have been shown to promote engagement with other cognitive-behavioral treatments, but no studies to date have examined these techniques as adjuncts to treatment for PTSD. Because of its focus on reducing avoidance, ACT is uniquely suited for promoting treatment engagement with the “gold standard” treatments for PTSD. The authors review the existing research on ACT as an adjunctive intervention, discuss specific concepts and techniques from ACT that are relevant to PTSD, and provide recommendations for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ACT has been shown to be superior to traditional exposure-based therapy in increasing participants' engagement and decreasing the rate of dropout.
“In practical application, ACT has also been shown to be superior to traditional exposure-based therapy in increasing participants' engagement and decreasing the rate of dropout (Phillips et al., 2020; Ong et al., 2018).”
From Efficacy and mechanisms of mobile application-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in China: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as Phillips et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Phillips, M. A., Chase, T., Bautista, C., Tang, A., & Teng, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
- ORCID
- Bautista, Chandra
- Venue
- Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 264-277
- ISSN
- 0025-9284 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3090604072
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- acceptance and commitment therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, veterans, treatment engagement, avoidance, adjunctive intervention, cognitive defusion, values clarification, transdiagnostic treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Patient Participation, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review