The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is negative about positive illusions? when benefits for the individual harm the collective.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“But even if this is not the case, the practical implications of one’s own irrational action are usually magnified in collaboration and joint irrational agency”
From Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation (2017) · cites this paper as Goleman, 1989
Citations
Cites
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
Active Coping Processes, Coping Dispositions, and Recovery from Surgery
Cohen, F., & Lazarus, R. S. (1973) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197309000-00002 · Cited by 520
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kull S., 1985, Foreign Policy, 58, 36
- Shavit Y., 1983, Proceedings of the Western Pharmacological Society, 26, 53
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation
Szanto, T. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02002 · Cited by 12
“However, I not only contend that these are common phenomena; moreover, I believe that, if it is true that individual practical irrationality is in the long run harmful for those who entertain it, this is even more so in collaborative cases (Goleman, 1989).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Goleman, D. J.
- Affiliations
- New York Times (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goleman, Daniel J.
- Venue
- Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 190-197
- ISSN
- 0736-7236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076676694
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- positive illusions, self-enhancement, personal benefits, collective harm, group dynamics, self-serving bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
