Commentary on the Special Issue: Critical Distinctions Between Vulnerable Narcissism and Depressive Personalities
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Entitlement, assertiveness, overvaluing one's own accomplishments, and aggressive reactions when aspirations fail or remain unrecognized are distinguishing features accompanying self-negativity and depressivity in vulnerable narcissism.
“However, entitlement, assertiveness, overvaluing one’s own accomplishments, and aggressive reactions when aspirations fail or remain unrecognized are distinguishing features accompanying self-negativity and depressivity in vulnerable narcissism.”
From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Huprich, S. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Detroit Mercy (US)
- Corresponding author
- Huprich, Steven K.
- ORCID
- Huprich, Steven K.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality Disorders
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- Supplement
- Pages
- 207-209
- ISSN
- 0885-579X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3012545729
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- vulnerable narcissism, depressive personality, personality disorders, personality disorder classification
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Narcissism, Personality, Personality Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review