Dysfunctional Responses to Emotion Mediate the Cross-Sectional Relationship Between Rejection Sensitivity and Borderline Personality Features
Abstract
A growing body of evidence has tied borderline personality disorder (BPD) to heightened sensitivity to rejection; however, mechanisms through which rejection sensitivity contributes to BPD features have not been identified. Rejection may lead to the dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies common in BPD, such as impulsive responses to distress, anger rumination, difficulties engaging in goal-oriented behavior, nonacceptance of emotions, and low emotional clarity. The present study used self-report measures and bootstrapping procedures to investigate the role of difficulties in emotional regulation in the relationship between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality features in a cross-sectional sample of 410 undergraduates. Difficulties in emotion regulation accounted for significant variance in the relationships between rejection sensitivity and BPD features, with varying sets of deficits in emotion regulation skills accounting for associations with specific BPD features. Potential clinical implications and the need for replication in longitudinal studies are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only one study considered individual symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder; in this study 'dysfunctional responses to emotion' accounted for a large portion of the effect of rejection sensitivity on PAI-BOR.
“Only one study considered individual symptoms of BPD; in this study 'dysfunctional responses to emotion' accounted for large portion of effect of RS on PAI-BOR (Peters, Smart, & Baer, 2015).”
From The link between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Peters, Smart, & Baer, 2015
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 27 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Peters, J. R., Smart, L. M., & Baer, R. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality Disorders
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 231-240
- ISSN
- 0885-579X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104542465
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- rejection sensitivity, borderline personality traits, emotion regulation, emotional dysregulation, borderline personality disorder, anger rumination, emotional clarity, goal-directed behavior, undergraduate students
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anger, Borderline Personality Disorder, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Rejection, Psychology, Stress, Psychological, Students, Young Adult, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review