A qualitative study of determinants of PTSD treatment initiation in veterans
Abstract
Although there are effective treatments for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), many PTSD sufferers wait years to decades before seeking professional help, if they seek it at all. An understanding of factors affecting treatment initiation for PTSD can inform strategies to promote help-seeking. We conducted a qualitative study to identify determinants of PTSD treatment initiation among 44 U.S. military veterans from the Vietnam and Afghanistan/Iraq wars; half were and half were not receiving treatment. Participants described barriers to and facilitators of treatment initiation within themselves, the post-trauma socio-cultural environment, the health care and disability systems, and their social networks. Lack of knowledge about PTSD was a barrier that occurred at both the societal and individual levels. Another important barrier theme was the enduring effect of experiencing an invalidating socio-cultural environment following trauma exposure. In some cases, system and social network facilitation led to treatment initiation despite individual-level barriers, such as beliefs and values that conflicted with help-seeking. Our findings expand the dominant model of service utilization by explicit incorporation of factors outside the individual into a conceptual framework of PTSD treatment initiation. Finally, we offer suggestions regarding the direction of future research and the development of interventions to promote timely help-seeking for PTSD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are often barriers to treatment initiation among those suffering from PTSD, including stigma, motivation, cost, and access to care.
“there are often barriers to treatment initiation among those suffering from PTSD, including stigma, motivation, cost, and access to care (18).”
From Exercise Intervention in PTSD: A Narrative Review and Rationale for Implementation (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 288
- Authors
- Sayer, N. A., Friedemann-Sanchez, G., Spoont, M., Murdoch, M., Parker, L. E., Chiros, C., & Rosenheck, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 238-255
- ISSN
- 0033-2747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170932307
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, treatment initiation, help-seeking, military veterans, barriers to treatment, facilitators of treatment, health system barriers, social networks, Vietnam War veterans, Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, service utilization
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Qualitative Research, Vietnam Conflict, Iraq War, 2003-2011, Afghan Campaign 2001-
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review