Cited by 207Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorTreatment of Major DepressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Why does depression hurt? Ancestral primary process separation-distress (PANIC/GRIEF) and diminished brain reward (SEEKING) processes in the genesis of depressive affect

Panksepp, Jaak, Watt, Douglas·2011·Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/psyc.2011.74.1.5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 207

Authors
Panksepp, J., & Watt, D.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes
Published
2011-03
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
5-13
ISSN
0033-2747 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051458162
Cited by
207
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
depression, brain reward, depressive affect, evolutionary psychology
MeSH terms
Affect, Animals, Brain, Buprenorphine, Depression, Disease Models, Animal, Biological Evolution, Grief, Humans, Models, Neurological, Panic, Reward

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review