Cited by 108Social and Intergroup PsychologyFace Recognition and PerceptionRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The contribution of face familiarity to ingroup favoritism and stereotyping

Zebrowitz, Leslie A., Bronstad, P. Matthew, Lee, Hoon Koo·2007·Social Cognition

Abstract

The familiar face overgeneralization hypothesis holds that an own–race positivity bias is, in part, a perceptual by–product of reactions to familiar people versus unfamiliar–looking strangers. Because prototypical facial structure varies across racial groups and communities are often racially segregated, strangers from one's own racial group should appear more familiar than strangers from a different racial group, contributing to ingroup favoritism and negative outgroup stereotypes. As predicted, the lower familiarity of own– than other–race faces mediated Koreans' and White Americans' ingroup favoritism in Study 1 and Black and White Americans' ingroup favoritism in Study 2. Lower familiarity of other–race faces also mediated negative stereotypes of other–race faces and partially suppressed positive ones, with familiarity effects confined to affectively valenced stereotypes. The results suggest that the unfamiliarity of other–race faces contributes not only to ingroup favoritism but also to a dual-process stereotyping in which both cultural beliefs and negative affective reactions to unfamiliarity make a contribution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.306

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The choice of using intelligence, trustworthiness, sociability and happiness as dependent attributes for the halo effect was driven by existing literature.

    “The choice of using intelligence, trustworthiness, sociability and happiness as dependent attributes for the halo effect was driven by existing literature on this cognitive bias, such as [4,6,8,9,22,53,60–63].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 81 · Cited by 108

Authors
Zebrowitz, L. A., Bronstad, P. M., & Lee, H. K.
Affiliations
  • Brandeis University (US)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
Venue
Social Cognition
Published
2007-04
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
306-338
ISSN
0278-016X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140501358
Cited by
108
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Cognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
face familiarity, in-group favoritism, stereotyping, racial segregation, Korean Americans, African Americans, White Americans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review