Of love and death: the emerging role of romantic disruption in suicidal behavior
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dysfunctional romantic relationships and unreciprocated love have been associated with substantial psychological distress and suicidal behavior.
“Dysfunctional romantic relationships and unreciprocated love have been associated with substantial psychological distress and suicidal behavior (Canetto and Lester, 2002; Emanuele, 2009).”
From Oxytocin during the initial stages of romantic attachment: Relations to couples’ interactive reciprocity (2012) · cites this paper as Emanuele, 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 4
- Authors
- Emanuele, E.
- Corresponding author
- Emanuele, Enzo
- ORCID
- Emanuele, Enzo
- Venue
- Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 240-240
- ISSN
- 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-278X
- OpenAlex
- W4246571667
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Keywords
- romantic relationships, suicidal behavior, suicide risk, romantic breakup
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
