The DOI matches its Crossref record.
2. Towards a Theory of Online Learning
Open accessAbstract
It is the theory which decides what we can observe
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blended learning via distance in pre-registration nursing education: A scoping review
Jowsey, T., Foster, G., Cooper-Ioelu, P., & Jacobs, S. (2020) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102775 · Cited by 349
Social networking, knowledge sharing, and student learning: The case of university students
Eid, M. I. M., & Al-Jabri, I. M. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.007 · Cited by 326
Care, Communication, Support: Core for Designing Meaningful Online Collaborative Learning
Robinson, H. A., Kilgore, W., & Warren, S. J. (2017) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v21i4.1240 · Cited by 89
Kang, H., & Chang, B. (2016) · Journal of International Students · doi:10.32674/jis.v6i3.356 · Cited by 70
Watson, D. P., Ahonen, E. Q., Shuman, V., Brown, M., Tsemberis, S., Huynh, P., Ouyang, F., & Xu, H. (2018) · Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy · doi:10.1186/s13011-018-0172-3 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, T.
- Venue
- The Theory and Practice of Online Learning
- Publisher
- Athabasca University Press
- Published
- 2008-12-31
- Pages
- 45-74
- OpenAlex
- W2625845218
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 49.41
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2. Towards a Theory of Online Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.004
- The paper
- Anderson, T. (2008). 2. Towards a Theory of Online Learning. The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
