Circadian Forced Desynchrony of the Master Clock Leads to Phenotypic Manifestation of Depression in Rats
Open accessAbstract
In mammals, a master circadian clock within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus maintains the phase coherence among a wide array of behavioral and physiological circadian rhythms. Affective disorders are typically associated with disruption of this fine-tuned “internal synchronization,” but whether this internal misalignment is part of the physiopathology of mood disorders is not clear. To date, depressive-like behavior in animal models has been induced by methods that fail to specifically target the SCN regulation of internal synchronization as the mode to generate depression. In the rat, exposure to a 22-h light-dark cycle (LD22) leads to the uncoupling of two distinct populations of neuronal oscillators within the SCN. This genetically, neurally, and pharmacologically intact animal model represents a unique opportunity to assess the effect of a systematic challenge to the central circadian pacemaker on phenotypic manifestations of mood disorders. We show that LD22 circadian forced desynchrony in rats induces depressive-like phenotypes including anhedonia, sexual dysfunction, and increased immobility in the forced swim test (FST), as well as changes in the levels and turnover rates of monoamines within the prefrontal cortex. Desynchronized rats show increased FST immobility during the dark (active) phase but decreased immobility during the light (rest) phase, suggesting a decrease in the amplitude of the normal daily oscillation in this behavioral manifestation of depression. Our results support the notion that the prolonged internal misalignment of circadian rhythms induced by environmental challenge to the central circadian pacemaker may constitute part of the etiology of depression.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Genetic disruption of circadian rhythms in the SCN via SCN-specific Bmal1-knockdown, or forced desynchrony of the SCN via exposure to a T22 light-dark cycle, increased depressive-like behavior in mice and rats, respectively.
“Genetic disruption of circadian rhythms in the SCN via SCN-specific Bmal1-knockdown, or forced desynchrony of the SCN via exposure to a T22 light–dark cycle increased depressive-like behavior in mice and rats, respectively90,91.”
From Circadian rhythm disruption and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [90]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 57
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Delgado PL (2000) Depression: the case for a monoamine deficiency. J Clin Psychiatr 61: 7– 11. 10775018
- Authors
- Ben-Hamo, M., Larson, T. A., Duge, L. S., Sikkema, C., Wilkinson, C. W., de la Iglesia, H. O., & González, M. M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- González, Mónica M. C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- eneuro
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- ENEURO.0237-16.2016
- ISSN
- 2373-2822 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5216685
- OpenAlex
- W2560760281
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- eNeuro (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- HHS | National Institutes of Health (100000002, R01MH075016, R01NS094211)
- National Science Foundation (100000001, IOS0909716)
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (100009670, Young Investigator Award)
- Israeli Committee for Higher Education (Postdoctoral Fellowship for Women)
- Washington Research Foundation (100001906, Postdoctoral Fellowship for Innovation in Neuroengineering)
- Geriatric Research and Clinical Center, and the Research and Development Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- suprachiasmatic nucleus, depression, circadian misalignment, anhedonia, sexual dysfunction, monoamine turnover, prefrontal cortex, mood disorders, circadian pacemaker
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Depressive Disorder, Disease Models, Animal, Exploratory Behavior, Food Preferences, Male, Motor Activity, Phenotype, Saccharin, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Swimming, Cohort Studies, Rats, Wistar, Photoperiod, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological, Circadian Clocks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review