Characterizing the Cortical Activity through Which Pain Emerges from Nociception
Open accessAbstract
Nociception begins when Adelta- and C-nociceptors are activated. However, the processing of nociceptive input by the cortex is required before pain can be consciously experienced from nociception. To characterize the cortical activity related to the emergence of this experience, we recorded, in humans, laser-evoked potentials elicited by physically identical nociceptive stimuli that were either perceived or unperceived. Infrared laser pulses, which selectively activate skin nociceptors, were delivered to the hand dorsum either as a pair of rapidly succeeding and spatially displaced stimuli (two-thirds of trials) or as a single stimulus (one-third of trials). After each trial, subjects reported whether one or two distinct painful pinprick sensations, associated with Adelta-nociceptor activation, had been perceived. The psychophysical feedback after each pair of stimuli was used to adjust the interstimulus interval (ISI) of the subsequent pair: when a single percept was reported, ISI was increased by 40 ms; when two distinct percepts were reported, ISI was decreased by 40 ms. This adaptive algorithm ensured that the probability of perceiving the second stimulus of the pair tended toward 0.5. We found that the magnitude of the early-latency N1 wave was similar between perceived and unperceived stimuli, whereas the magnitudes of the later N2 and P2 waves were reduced when stimuli were unperceived. These findings suggest that the N1 wave represents an early stage of sensory processing related to the ascending nociceptive input, whereas the N2 and P2 waves represent a later stage of processing related, directly or indirectly, to the perceptual outcome of this nociceptive input.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The later N2 and P2 components reflect cortical generators in the insular and anterior cingulate cortices and largely represent cortical mechanisms that determine the subjective experience of pain.
“The later N2 and P2 components reflect cortical generators in the insular and anterior cingulate cortices 30, 63, and also relate to the intensity of noxious stimuli, although they largely represent cortical mechanisms that determine the subjective experience of pain 48.”
From The Analgesic Effect of Oxytocin in Humans: A Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Cross‐Over Study Using Laser‐Evoked Potentials (2016) · cites this paper as [48]
The early N1 component reflects activity of cortical generators in the contralateral operculoinsular and primary somatosensory cortices and is largely driven by the magnitude of ascending nociceptive input, representing an early stage of sensory processing before the perceptual outcome is determined.
“The early N1 component, reflecting the activity of cortical generators in the contralateral operculoinsular and primary somatosensory cortices 30, 63, is largely driven by the magnitude of the ascending nociceptive input, representing an early stage of sensory processing before the perceptual outcome of the nociceptive input is determined 48, 64, 65.”
From The Analgesic Effect of Oxytocin in Humans: A Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Cross‐Over Study Using Laser‐Evoked Potentials (2016) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 118 · Cited by 169
- Authors
- Lee, M. C., Mouraux, A., & Iannetti, G. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Iannetti, G. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-06-17
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 7909-7916
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6665631
- OpenAlex
- W1967205531
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Royal Society
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- pain perception, nociception, laser-evoked potentials, N1 component, P2 component, C nociceptors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Afferent Pathways, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Humans, Lasers, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Time Factors, Pain Threshold, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review