Cited by 48Retinal Development and DisordersRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research

Normal cone function requires the interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein

Open access
Parker, Ryan O., Fan, Jie, Nickerson, John M., Liou, Gregory I., Crouch, Rosalie K.·2009·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

11-cis-retinal is the light-sensitive component in rod and cone photoreceptors, and its isomerization to all-trans retinal in the presence of light initiates the visual response. For photoreceptors to function normally, all-trans retinal must be converted back into 11-cis-retinal through a series of enzymatic steps known as the visual cycle. The interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) is a proposed retinoid transporter in the visual cycle, but rods in Irbp−/−mice have a normal visual cycle. While rods are primarily responsible for dim light vision, the ability of cones to function in constant light is essential to human vision and may be facilitated by cone-specific visual cycle pathways. We analyzed the cones in Irbp−/−mice to determine whether IRBP has a cone-specific visual cycle function. Cone electroretinogram (ERG) responses were reduced in Irbp−/−mice, but similar responses from Irbp−/−mice at all ages suggest that degeneration does not underlie cone dysfunction. Furthermore, cone densities and opsin levels in Irbp−/−mice were similar to C57BL/6(wild-type) mice, and both cone opsins were properly localized to the cone outer segments. To test for retinoid deficiency in Irbp−/−mice, ERGs were analyzed before and after intraperitoneal injections of 9-cis-retinal. Treatment with 9-cis-retinal produced a significant recovery of the cone response in Irbp−/−mice and shows that retinoid deficiency underlies cone dysfunction. These data indicate that IRBP is essential to normal cone function and demonstrate that differences exist in the visual cycle of rods and cones.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0063-09.2009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under photopic conditions, cones of Irbp-/- mice lack retinoids.

    “Cones in Irbp-/- mice were found to be retinoid-deficient under photopic conditions in two studies (Parker et al., 2009), leading to the proposal that 11-cis retinol supplies are disrupted in the absence of IRBP.”

    From New insights into retinoid metabolism and cycling within the retina (2013) · cites this paper as Parker et al., 2009

  • In Irbp-/- mice carrying the Met450 RPE65 variant, cone ERG responses were lower, but cone density and cone opsin levels/distribution were unchanged.

    “Parker et al. (Parker et al., 2009) found a reduction in cone ERG responses in Irbp-/- mice having the Met450 variant of RPE65 but observed no change in cone density or cone opsin levels and distribution.”

    From New insights into retinoid metabolism and cycling within the retina (2013) · cites this paper as Parker et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 48

Authors
Parker, R. O., Fan, J., Nickerson, J. M., Liou, G. I., & Crouch, R. K.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Augusta University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2009-04-08
Volume
29
Issue
14
Pages
4616-4621
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2087579963
Cited by
48
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Funders
  • Foundation Fighting Blindness
  • Research to Prevent Blindness (EY006360)
  • Emory University
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • University of South Carolina
  • National Institutes of Health (EY006360)
  • National Eye Institute (EY04939, EY 017045, R24EY014793, EY 006360, R01EY016470, EY 016470, R01EY004939, R24EY017045, P30EY006360)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Keywords
interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein, visual cycle, cone photoreceptors, 11-cis-retinal, cone electroretinogram, 9-cis-retinal
MeSH terms
Retinol-Binding Proteins, Interstitial, Animals, Eye Proteins, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Retinol-Binding Proteins, Visual Perception, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells, Mice, Knockout, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review