Normal cone function requires the interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein
Open accessAbstract
11-cis-retinal is the light-sensitive component in rod and cone photoreceptors, and its isomerization to all-trans retinal in the presence of light initiates the visual response. For photoreceptors to function normally, all-trans retinal must be converted back into 11-cis-retinal through a series of enzymatic steps known as the visual cycle. The interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) is a proposed retinoid transporter in the visual cycle, but rods in Irbp−/−mice have a normal visual cycle. While rods are primarily responsible for dim light vision, the ability of cones to function in constant light is essential to human vision and may be facilitated by cone-specific visual cycle pathways. We analyzed the cones in Irbp−/−mice to determine whether IRBP has a cone-specific visual cycle function. Cone electroretinogram (ERG) responses were reduced in Irbp−/−mice, but similar responses from Irbp−/−mice at all ages suggest that degeneration does not underlie cone dysfunction. Furthermore, cone densities and opsin levels in Irbp−/−mice were similar to C57BL/6(wild-type) mice, and both cone opsins were properly localized to the cone outer segments. To test for retinoid deficiency in Irbp−/−mice, ERGs were analyzed before and after intraperitoneal injections of 9-cis-retinal. Treatment with 9-cis-retinal produced a significant recovery of the cone response in Irbp−/−mice and shows that retinoid deficiency underlies cone dysfunction. These data indicate that IRBP is essential to normal cone function and demonstrate that differences exist in the visual cycle of rods and cones.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Under photopic conditions, cones of Irbp-/- mice lack retinoids.
“Cones in Irbp-/- mice were found to be retinoid-deficient under photopic conditions in two studies (Parker et al., 2009), leading to the proposal that 11-cis retinol supplies are disrupted in the absence of IRBP.”
From New insights into retinoid metabolism and cycling within the retina (2013) · cites this paper as Parker et al., 2009
In Irbp-/- mice carrying the Met450 RPE65 variant, cone ERG responses were lower, but cone density and cone opsin levels/distribution were unchanged.
“Parker et al. (Parker et al., 2009) found a reduction in cone ERG responses in Irbp-/- mice having the Met450 variant of RPE65 but observed no change in cone density or cone opsin levels and distribution.”
From New insights into retinoid metabolism and cycling within the retina (2013) · cites this paper as Parker et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Parker, R. O., Fan, J., Nickerson, J. M., Liou, G. I., & Crouch, R. K.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Augusta University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-04-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 4616-4621
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3696194
- OpenAlex
- W2087579963
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
- Funders
- Foundation Fighting Blindness
- Research to Prevent Blindness (EY006360)
- Emory University
- Medical University of South Carolina
- University of South Carolina
- National Institutes of Health (EY006360)
- National Eye Institute (EY04939, EY 017045, R24EY014793, EY 006360, R01EY016470, EY 016470, R01EY004939, R24EY017045, P30EY006360)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
- Keywords
- interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein, visual cycle, cone photoreceptors, 11-cis-retinal, cone electroretinogram, 9-cis-retinal
- MeSH terms
- Retinol-Binding Proteins, Interstitial, Animals, Eye Proteins, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Retinol-Binding Proteins, Visual Perception, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells, Mice, Knockout, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review