The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Loss of miR-183/96 Alters Synaptic Strength via Presynaptic and Postsynaptic Mechanisms at a Central Synapse
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A regulation of AMPAR subunits by miRNAs has been demonstrated for GluA1 and GluA2.”
From MicroRNA‐138‐5p suppresses excitatory synaptic strength at the cerebellar input layer (2025) · cites this paper as Krohs et al., 2021
In the citing paper
“In contrast to our observation of a miR‐138‐5p‐dependent regulation of release probability at cerebellar MF–GC synapses, global knockout of miR‐183 and miR‐96 increased RRP size without affecting release probability at the calyx of Held.”
From MicroRNA‐138‐5p suppresses excitatory synaptic strength at the cerebellar input layer (2025) · cites this paper as Krohs et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Release probability of hippocampal glutamatergic terminals scales with the size of the active zone
Holderith, N., Lorincz, A., Katona, G., Rózsa, B., Kulik, A., Watanabe, M., & Nusser, Z. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3137 · Cited by 405
The Morphological and Molecular Nature of Synaptic Vesicle Priming at Presynaptic Active Zones
Imig, C., Min, S.-W., Krinner, S., Arancillo, M., Rosenmund, C., Südhof, T. C., Rhee, J., Brose, N., & Cooper, B. H. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.009 · Cited by 389
miR-96 regulates the progression of differentiation in mammalian cochlear inner and outer hair cells
Kuhn, S., Johnson, S. L., Furness, D. N., Chen, J., Ingham, N., Hilton, J. M., Steffes, G., Lewis, M. A., Zampini, V., Hackney, C. M., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1016646108 · Cited by 114
Soldà, G., Robusto, M., Primignani, P., Castorina, P., Benzoni, E., Cesarani, A., Ambrosetti, U., Asselta, R., & Duga, S. (2012) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddr493 · Cited by 102
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ben-Yosef T, Belyantseva IA, Saunders TL, Hughes ED, Kawamoto K, Van Itallie CM, Beyer LA, Halsey K, Gardner DJ, Wilcox ER, Rasmussen J, Anderson JM, Dolan DF, Forge A, Raphael Y, Camper SA, Friedman TB (2003) Claudin 14 knockout mice, a model for autosomal recessive deaf- ness DFNB29, are deaf due to cochlear hair cell degeneration. Hum Mol Genet 12:2049-2061.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MicroRNA‐138‐5p suppresses excitatory synaptic strength at the cerebellar input layer
Delvendahl, I., Daswani, R., Winterer, J., Germain, P., Uhr, N. M., Schratt, G., & Müller, M. (2025) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp288019 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Krohs, C., Körber, C., Ebbers, L., Altaf, F., Hollje, G., Hoppe, S., Dörflinger, Y., Prosser, H. M., & Nothwang, H. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2021-06-30
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 6796-6811
- ISSN
- 0270-6474
- 1529-2401
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
