The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Orientation of neurite growth by extracellular electric fields
Open accessAbstract
Extracellularly applied steady electric fields of 0.1 to 10 V/cm were found to have marked effects on the neurite growth of single dissociated Xenopus neurons in culture: (1) neurites facing the cathode showed accelerated growth, while the growth of those facing the anode was reduced. Neurites growing relatively perpendicular to the field axis were prompted to curve toward the cathode. (2) More neurites appeared to be initiate from the cathodal side of the cell. (3) The number of neurite-bearing neurons per culture and the average neurite length were increased. These effects are absent in cultures treated with electric fields of similar strength but alternating polarity and cannot be attributed either to a gradient of extracellular diffusible substances or to the flow of culture medium produced by the field. The field effects are reversible: (1) removal of the electric field resulted in the loss of neurite orientation in a few hours and (2) reversal of the polarity of the electric field led to a rapid reversal in the neurite orientation. To determine the cellular loci of these field effects, we treated the neurons with a number of pharmacological agents or altered their ionic environments. Incubation with concanavalin A (Con A) was found to abolish these filed effects completely. Since the binding of Con A to the neuronal surface was shown to prevent field-induced accumulation of the Con A receptors toward the cathodal side of these neurons, our finding is accumulation of the Con A receptors toward the cathodal side of these neurons, our finding is consistent with the notion that cathodal accumulation of growth-controlling surface glycoproteins by the field is the underlying mechanism of the field-induced orientation of neurite growth toward the cathode.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polypyrrole-coated electrospun PLGA nanofibers for neural tissue applications
Lee, J. Y., Bashur, C. A., Goldstein, A. S., & Schmidt, C. E. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.042 · Cited by 735
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L., Prabhakaran, M. P., Morshed, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H., Baharvand, H., Kiani, S., Al-Deyab, S. S., & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.383 · Cited by 698
Calcium regulation of the neuronal growth cone
Kater, S. B., Mattson, M. P., Cohan, C., & Connor, J. (1988) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(88)90094-x · Cited by 579
Gomez, N., & Schmidt, C. E. (2007) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31047 · Cited by 306
A small, physiological electric field orients cell division
Zhao, M., Forrester, J. V., & McCaig, C. D. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.9.4942 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Patel, N., & Poo, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1982-04-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 483-496
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1661921944
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Orientation of neurite growth by extracellular electric fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.02-04-00483.1982
- The paper
- Patel, N., & Poo, M. (1982). Orientation of neurite growth by extracellular electric fields. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.02-04-00483.1982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.