Cited by 37Visual perception and processing mechanismsAdvanced Vision and ImagingMultisensory perception and integration

Joint Representation of Depth from Motion Parallax and Binocular Disparity Cues in Macaque Area MT

Open access
Nadler, J. W., Barbash, D., Kim, H. R., Shimpi, S., Angelaki, D. E., DeAngelis, G. C.·2013·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Perception of depth is based on a variety of cues, with binocular disparity and motion parallax generally providing more precise depth information than pictorial cues. Much is known about how neurons in visual cortex represent depth from binocular disparity or motion parallax, but little is known about the joint neural representation of these depth cues. We recently described neurons in the middle temporal (MT) area that signal depth sign (near vs far) from motion parallax; here, we examine whether and how these neurons also signal depth from binocular disparity. We find that most MT neurons in rhesus monkeys (Macaca Mulatta) are selective for depth sign based on both disparity and motion parallax cues. However, the depth-sign preferences (near or far) are not always aligned: 56% of MT neurons have matched depth-sign preferences ("congruent" cells) whereas the remaining 44% of neurons prefer near depth from motion parallax and far depth from disparity, or vice versa ("opposite" cells). For congruent cells, depth-sign selectivity increases when disparity cues are added to motion parallax, but this enhancement does not occur for opposite cells. This suggests that congruent cells might contribute to perceptual integration of depth cues. We also found that neurons are clustered in MT according to their depth tuning based on motion parallax, similar to the known clustering of MT neurons for binocular disparity. Together, these findings suggest that area MT is involved in constructing a representation of 3D scene structure that takes advantage of multiple depth cues available to mobile observers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0251-13.2013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are other cases where similar tuning properties emerge, such as binocular disparity and motion parallax cues.

    “While this domain has provided specific insight into congruent and opposite representations for multimodal motion cues, there are other cases where similar tuning properties emerge (e.g., binocular disparity and motion parallax cues) (35, 36).”

    From How multisensory neurons solve causal inference. (2021) · cites this paper as [35]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 37

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Howard IP, Rogers BJ (2002) Seeing in depth. In: Depth perception. Vol. 2. Toronto: I.

Authors
Nadler, J. W., Barbash, D., Kim, H. R., Shimpi, S., Angelaki, D. E., & DeAngelis, G. C.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2013-08-28
Volume
33
Issue
35
Pages
14061-14074
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2121031039
Cited by
37
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY019087, EY-019087, EY-001319, EY-013644, R01EY013644, P30EY001319)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
depth perception, binocular disparity, motion parallax, depth cue integration, 3D scene structure, binocular vision
MeSH terms
Animals, Cues, Macaca mulatta, Male, Motion Perception, Neurons, Temporal Lobe, Visual Cortex, Vision Disparity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review