The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Typical and atypical neuroleptics: differential effects of chronic administration on the activity of A9 and A10 midbrain dopaminergic neurons
Open accessAbstract
Extracellular single unit recording techniques were used to study the effects of both acute and repeated oral neuroleptic administration on the in vivo activity of rat A9 and A10 dopaminergic (DA) neurons. All antipsychotic drugs examined acutely (haloperidol, l-sulpiride, chlorpromazine, and clozapine) increased the number of spontaneously firing DA neurons in both A9 and A10 compared to controls. Repeated (21 day) treatment with haloperidol, l-sulpiride, and chlorpromazine (antipsychotic drugs which can cause extrapyramidal side effects) markedly reduced the number of active DA cells below control levels in both regions. The “silent” DA neurons were in an apparent state of tonic depolarization inactivation since they could be induced to discharge by the microiontophoretic application of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid, but not the excitatory amino acid glutamate. The depolarization inactivation observed may be specific for antipsychotic drugs since a non-neuroleptic phenothiazine (promethazine), the inactive isomer of sulpiride (d-sulpiride), and a tricyclic antidepressant (desmethylimipramine) neither increased DA activity when given acutely nor induced depolarization inactivation when administered repeatedly. In contrast to the other drugs tested, repeated treatment with clozapine (an effective antipsychotic drug which does not produce extrapyramidal side effects) resulted in the depolarization inactivation of A10 neurons but not A9 cells. These data suggest that neuroleptics which can induce extrapyramidal side effects produce depolarization inactivation of both A9 and A10 neurons whereas antipsychotic drugs which lack this property inactivate only A10 neurons. It is suggested that the time-dependent development of A9 DA neuron inactivation induced by repeated neuroleptic treatment may provide a mechanism for understanding the delayed onset of extrapyramidal side effects often observed with these drugs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Swanson, L. W. (1982) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0361-9230(82)90145-9 · Cited by 1,718
Cited by
Grace, A. A. (1991) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(91)90196-u · Cited by 1,831
Miyamoto, S., Duncan, G. E., Marx, C. E., & Lieberman, J. A. (2005) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001556 · Cited by 988
Clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. incidence and risk factors in the united states
Alvir, J. M. J., Lieberman, J. A., Safferman, A. Z., Schwimmer, J. L., & Schaaf, J. A. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199307153290303 · Cited by 967
Gerfen, C., Herkenham, M., & Thibault, J. (1987) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.07-12-03915.1987 · Cited by 803
O'Donnell, P., & Grace, A. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-05-03622.1995 · Cited by 760
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiodo, L., & Bunney, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1983-08-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1607-1619
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1561239748
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Typical and atypical neuroleptics: differential effects of chronic administration on the activity of A9 and A10 midbrain dopaminergic neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.03-08-01607.1983
- The paper
- Chiodo, L., & Bunney, B. (1983). Typical and atypical neuroleptics: differential effects of chronic administration on the activity of A9 and A10 midbrain dopaminergic neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.03-08-01607.1983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.