Cited by 129Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsCancer Treatment and PharmacologyCannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Cannabinoid Type-1 Receptor Reduces Pain and Neurotoxicity Produced by Chemotherapy

Open access
Khasabova, Iryna A., Khasabov, Sergey, Paz, Justin, Harding-Rose, Catherine, Simone, Donald A., Seybold, Virginia S.·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Painful peripheral neuropathy is a dose-limiting complication of chemotherapy. Cisplatin produces a cumulative toxic effect on peripheral nerves, and 30–40% of cancer patients receiving this agent experience pain. By modeling cisplatin-induced hyperalgesia in mice with daily injections of cisplatin (1 mg/kg, i.p.) for 7 d, we investigated the anti-hyperalgesic effects of anandamide (AEA) and cyclohexylcarbamic acid 3′-carbamoyl-biphenyl-3-yl ester (URB597), an inhibitor of AEA hydrolysis. Cisplatin-induced mechanical and heat hyperalgesia were accompanied by a decrease in the level of AEA in plantar paw skin. No changes in motor activity were observed after seven injections of cisplatin. Intraplantar injection of AEA (10 μg/10 μl) or URB597 (9 μg/10 μl) transiently attenuated hyperalgesia through activation of peripheral CB 1 receptors. Co-injections of URB597 (0.3 mg/kg daily, i.p.) with cisplatin decreased and delayed the development of mechanical and heat hyperalgesia. The effect of URB597 was mediated by CB 1 receptors since AM281 (0.33 mg/kg daily, i.p.) blocked the effect of URB597. Co-injection of URB597 also normalized the cisplatin-induced decrease in conduction velocity of Aα/Aβ-fibers and reduced the increase of ATF-3 and TRPV1 immunoreactivity in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. Since DRGs are a primary site of toxicity by cisplatin, effects of cisplatin were studied on cultured DRG neurons. Incubation of DRG neurons with cisplatin (4 μg/ml) for 24 h decreased the total length of neurites. URB597 (100 n m) attenuated these changes through activation of CB 1 receptors. Collectively, these results suggest that pharmacological facilitation of AEA signaling is a promising strategy for attenuating cisplatin-associated sensory neuropathy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0403-12.2012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AEA, THC, and WIN55,212-2 elicit antinociceptive effects in rodent models of cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy through a mechanism of action that requires activation of CB1 and CB2 receptors.

    “For example, AEA, THC, and WIN55,212-2 elicit antinociceptive effects in rodent models of cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy through a mechanism of action that requires activation of CB 1 (Harris et al, 2016;Khasabova et al, 2012) and CB 2 (Vera et al, 2013) receptors.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 129

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cooley ME Davis L Abrahm J 1994 Cisplatin: a clinical review. Part II--Nursing assessment and management of side effects of cisplatin Cancer Nurs 17 283 293 7954376
  2. He JC Neves SR Jordan JD Iyengar R 2006 Role of the Go/i signaling network in the regulation of neurite outgrowth Can J Physiol Pharmacol 84 687 694 16998532

Authors
Khasabova, I. A., Khasabov, S., Paz, J., Harding-Rose, C., Simone, D. A., & Seybold, V. S.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-05-16
Volume
32
Issue
20
Pages
7091-7101
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2113981135
Cited by
129
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Minnesota
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA011471, DA011471)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA138684, CA138684, P30CA077598)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Keywords
cannabinoid type 1 receptor, cisplatin, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, anandamide, URB597, hyperalgesia, dorsal root ganglion neurons, ATF3, TRPV1, axonal conduction velocity, neurite length, sensory neuropathy
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Arachidonic Acids, Benzamides, Carbamates, Cells, Cultured, Cisplatin, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Interactions, Enzyme Inhibitors, Ganglia, Spinal, Hyperalgesia, Male, Mice, Inbred C3H, Morpholines, Motor Activity, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Pyrazoles, Neurites, Neurotoxicity Syndromes, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1, TRPV Cation Channels, Mice, Activating Transcription Factor 3, Polyunsaturated Alkamides, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review