Cited by 61Motor Control and AdaptationHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The Motor Cortex Communicates with the Kidney

Open access
Levinthal, David J., Strick, Peter L.·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

We used retrograde transneuronal transport of rabies virus from the rat kidney to identify the areas of the cerebral cortex that are potential sources of central commands for the neural regulation of this organ. Our results indicate that multiple motor and nonmotor areas of the cerebral cortex contain output neurons that indirectly influence kidney function. These cortical areas include the primary motor cortex (M1), the rostromedial motor area (M2), the primary somatosensory cortex, the insula and other regions surrounding the rhinal fissure, and the medial prefrontal cortex. The vast majority of the output neurons from the cerebral cortex were located in two cortical areas, M1 (68%) and M2 (15%). If the visceromotor functions of M1 and M2 reflect their skeletomotor functions, then the output to the kidney from each cortical area could make a unique contribution to autonomic control. The output from M1 could add precision and organ-specific regulation to descending visceromotor commands, whereas the output from M2 could add anticipatory processing which is essential for allostatic regulation. We also found that the output from M1 and M2 to the kidney originates predominantly from the trunk representations of these two cortical areas. Thus, a map of visceromotor representation appears to be embedded within the classic somatotopic map of skeletomotor representation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0406-12.2012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple motor and non-motor areas of cortex directly influence kidney function, including M1, M2, S1 and the insula.

    “Levinthal and Strick (2012) have shown that multiple motor and non-motor areas of cortex directly influence kidney function, including M1, M2, S1 and the insula.”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Levinthal and Strick 2012

    The Discussion identifies M1, M2, S1 and the insula as cortical areas with output neurons that influence kidney function. It explicitly describes that influence as indirect, however, so the claim’s word “directly” overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • M1 and M2 have especially important contributions that arise from their respective trunk representation areas in motor cortex.

    “M1 and M2 have especially important contributions that arise from their respective trunk representation areas in motor cortex.”

    From Motion sickness: more than nausea and vomiting (2014) · cites this paper as Levinthal and Strick 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 61

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Iversen S Iversen L Saper CB Schwartz JH Jessell TM Kandel ER Principles of Neuroscience 2000 New York McGraw-Hill 960 981

Authors
Levinthal, D. J., & Strick, P. L.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-05-09
Volume
32
Issue
19
Pages
6726-6731
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1979644803
Cited by
61
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Pennsylvania Department of Health
  • Office of Research and Development (R01 NS24328)
  • National Institutes of Health (P40OD010996)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH056661, R01 MH56661)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK063922)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS24328, R01NS024328)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P40RR018604)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
motor cortex, kidney, rabies virus, primary motor cortex, autonomic regulation, somatosensory cortex, insula, medial prefrontal cortex, somatotopic map, allostatic regulation, descending motor commands
MeSH terms
Animals, Autonomic Nervous System, Biological Transport, Efferent Pathways, Kidney, Male, Motor Cortex, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Rabies virus, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review