Cited by 200Visual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integrationFace Recognition and Perception

Learning to See the Difference Specifically Alters the Most Informative V4 Neurons

Open access
Raiguel, S., Vogels, R., Mysore, S. G., Orban, G. A.·2006·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Perceptual learning is an instance of adult plasticity whereby training in a sensory (e.g., a visual task) results in neuronal changes leading to an improved ability to perform the task. Yet studies in primary visual cortex have found that changes in neuronal response properties were relatively modest. The present study examines the effects of training in an orientation discrimination task on the response properties of V4 neurons in awake rhesus monkeys. Results indicate that the changes induced in V4 are indeed larger than those in V1. Nonspecific effects of training included a decrease in response variance, and an increase in overall orientation selectivity in V4. The orientation-specific changes involved a local steepening in the orientation tuning curve around the trained orientation that selectively improved orientation discriminability at the trained orientation. Moreover, these changes were largely confined to the population of neurons whose orientation tuning was optimal for signaling small differences in orientation at the trained orientation. Finally, the modifications were restricted to the part of the tuning curve close to the trained orientation. Thus, we conclude that it is the most informative V4 neurons, those most directly involved in the discrimination, that are specifically modified by perceptual learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0457-06.2006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 200

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fahle M, Poggio T, eds (2002) Perceptual learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Authors
Raiguel, S., Vogels, R., Mysore, S. G., & Orban, G. A.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-06-14
Volume
26
Issue
24
Pages
6589-6602
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2076747979
Cited by
200
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
perceptual learning, V4, orientation discrimination, orientation selectivity, orientation tuning curves, adult neuroplasticity, primary visual cortex, rhesus monkeys, neuronal response properties, response variance
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Discrimination Learning, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Sensory Thresholds, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review