The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Membrane physiology of retinal glial (Muller) cells
Open accessAbstract
Electrophysiological techniques were used to determine the ion selectivity properties and the spatial distribution of the membrane conductance of amphibian Muller cells. Membrane potential changes recorded during ion substitution experiments in frog (Rana pipiens) retinal slices demonstrated that the Muller cell K+:Na+ membrane permeability ratio is approximately 490:1 and that cell Cl- permeability is extremely low. In frog retinal slices, Muller cell input resistance was 8.5 megohms when measured in the inner plexiform layer and 4.8 megohms when measured in the optic fiber layer. Intact, enzymatically dissociated salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) cells had an input resistance of 7.9 megohms, whereas cells lacking their endfoot process (removed by surgical microdissection or by shearing force) had a resistance of 152 megohms. Pressure ejection of a 100 mM K+ solution near the proximal surface of the endfeet of dissociated salamander cells produced depolarizations 7 times greater than did ejections near the lateral face of the endfoot and 24 to 50 times greater than did ejections near other cell regions. Similar K+ ejection results were obtained from Muller cells in salamander and frog retinal slices. Taken together, these results demonstrate that in both the frog and the salamander, approximately 95% of the total membrane conductance of Muller cells is localized in the cell's endfoot process. In salamander, the specific membrane resistance of the endfoot membrane was estimated to be 32 ohm X cm2 whereas the specific resistance of the remainder of the cell was 7300 ohm X cm2. This remarkably nonuniform conductance distribution has important consequences for theories concerning K+ regulation in the retina and for mechanisms underlying electroretinogram generation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Müller cell: a functional element of the retina
Newman, E., & Reichenbach, A. (1996) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(96)10040-0 · Cited by 788
Self-citationDiffusion and related transport mechanisms in brain tissue
Nicholson, C. (2001) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/64/7/202 · Cited by 490
B-wave of the electroretinogram. A reflection of ON bipolar cell activity
Stockton, R. A., & Slaughter, M. M. (1989) · The Journal of general physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.93.1.101 · Cited by 446
Role of glial cells in the regulation of the brain ion microenvironment
Walz, W. (1989) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(89)90005-1 · Cited by 444
Müller Glial Cells in Retinal Disease
Bringmann, A., & Wiedemann, P. (2012) · Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1159/000328979 · Cited by 436
Metadata
- Authors
- Newman, E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1985-08-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2225-2239
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1514971421
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Membrane physiology of retinal glial (Muller) cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.05-08-02225.1985
- The paper
- Newman, E. (1985). Membrane physiology of retinal glial (Muller) cells. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.05-08-02225.1985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.