Cited by 65Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Vagal nerve stimulation reverses aberrant dopamine system function in the methylazoxymethanol acetate rodent model of schizophrenia

Open access
Perez, S. M., Carreno, F. R., Frazer, A., Lodge, D. J.·2014·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is an alternative therapy for epilepsy and treatment refractory depression. Here we examine VNS as a potential therapy for the treatment of schizophrenia in the methylozoxymethanol acetate (MAM) rodent model of the disease. We have previously demonstrated that hyperactivity within ventral regions of the hippocampus (vHipp) drives the dopamine system dysregulation in this model. Moreover, by targeting the vHipp directly, we can reverse aberrant dopamine system function and associated behaviors in the MAM model. Although the central effects of VNS have not been completely delineated, positron emission topographic measurements of cerebral blood flow in humans have consistently reported that VNS stimulation induces bilateral decreases in hippocampal activity. Based on our previous observations, we performed in vivo extracellular electrophysiological recordings in MAM- and saline-treated rats to evaluate the effect of chronic (2 week) VNS treatment on the activity of putative vHipp pyramidal neurons, as well as downstream dopamine neuron activity in the ventral tegmental area. Here we demonstrate that chronic VNS was able to reverse both vHipp hyperactivity and aberrant mesolimbic dopamine neuron function in the MAM model of schizophrenia. Additionally, VNS reversed a behavioral correlate of the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Because current therapies for schizophrenia are far from adequate, with a large number of patients discontinuing treatment due to low efficacy or intolerable side effects, it is important to explore alternative nonpharmacological treatments. These data provide the first preclinical evidence that VNS may be a possible alternative therapeutic approach for the treatment of schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0588-14.2014

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 65

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rush AJ, Marangell LB, Sackeim HA, George MS, Brannan SK, Davis SM, Howland R, Kling MA, Rittberg BR, Burke WJ, Rapaport MH, Zajecka J, Nierenberg AA, Husain MM, Ginsberg D, Cooke RG (2005a) Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, con- trolled acute phase trial. Biol Psychiatry 58:347-354. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Perez, S. M., Carreno, F. R., Frazer, A., & Lodge, D. J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-07-09
Volume
34
Issue
28
Pages
9261-9267
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2040639008
Cited by
65
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh090067-10, MH090067)
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals International
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01: MH090067, F31MH098564, R01MH082933)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
vagus nerve stimulation, schizophrenia, ventral hippocampus, dopaminergic system, ventral tegmental area, mesolimbic dopamine neurons, hippocampal hyperactivity, positive symptoms, non-pharmacological treatment, extracellular recording
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Methylazoxymethanol Acetate, Neurotoxins, Schizophrenia, Treatment Outcome, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Dopaminergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review