Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 747

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantitative autoradiographic localization of the D1 and D2 subtypes of dopamine receptors in rat brain

Open access
Boyson, SJ, McGonigle, P, Molinoff, PB·1986·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The distribution of D1 and D2 receptors was studied in coronal sections of rat brain, using quantitative autoradiography. D1 receptors were labeled with 1.8 nM 3H-SKF-83566 (a brominated analog of 3H-SCH-23390), while D2 receptors were labeled with 1.0 nM 3H-spiroperidol (3H-SPD). The binding of both ligands to sections from brain and from a homogenate of caudate putamen (CPu mash) reached equilibrium within 80 min at 37 degrees C. CPu mash provided a virtually unlimited number of homogeneous sections that contained a high density of both D1 and D2 receptors. Sections of CPu mash were used in competition studies that confirmed that the specific binding of 3H-SKF-83566 was selective for D1 receptors, and that the binding of 3H-SPD was selective for D2 receptors. Scatchard analysis of equilibrium binding of the 2 ligands in the CPu in horizontal sections of rat brain revealed Kd values of 1.1 +/- 0.07 nM for 3H-SKF-83566 and 0.7 +/- 0.09 nM for 3H-SPD. Studies of the distribution of D1 and D2 receptors were carried out in coronal sections of brains from 5 rats. D1 receptors were found throughout the forebrain and were present in greater density than were D2 receptors in all regions examined except the olfactory nerve layer. In the CPu, nucleus accumbens, and olfactory tubercle, the densities of D1 and D2 receptors were, respectively, approximately 2,500 and 600–800 fmol/mg protein. In the substantia nigra, the density of D1 receptors was approximately 2,500 fmol/mg protein in both the compacta and the reticulata, but the density of D2 receptors was 230 fmol/mg protein in the compacta and 70 fmol/mg protein in the reticulata. The ventral tegmental area contained only 90 fmol/mg protein of D1 receptors, and D2 receptors were undetectable. The entopeduncular nucleus, zona incerta, and region of the ventral internal capsule had densities of D1 receptors of 550–950 fmol/mg protein and D2 receptor densities of less than 100 fmol/mg protein. Densities of D1 and D2 receptors were, respectively, 2,700 and 900 fmol/mg protein in the choroid plexus. Knowledge of the differences in the relative distributions of D1 and D2 receptors in various brain regions may increase our understanding of the functions of brain dopaminergic systems and may aid in the development of new therapeutic approaches for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.06-11-03177.1986

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 747

Metadata

Authors
Boyson, S., McGonigle, P., & Molinoff, P.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1986-11-01
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
3177-3188
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1884206649
Cited by
747
References
0
FWCI
13.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative autoradiographic localization of the D1 and D2 subtypes of dopamine receptors in rat brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.06-11-03177.1986
The paper
Boyson, S., McGonigle, P., & Molinoff, P. (1986). Quantitative autoradiographic localization of the D1 and D2 subtypes of dopamine receptors in rat brain. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.06-11-03177.1986

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.