Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,802

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ionic dependence of glutamate neurotoxicity

Open access
Choi, DW·1987·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The cellular mechanisms by which excess exposure to the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate can produce neuronal injury are unknown. More than a decade ago it was hypothesized that glutamate neurotoxicity (GNT) is a direct consequence of excessive neuronal excitation (“excitotoxicity” hypothesis); more recently, it has been hypothesized that a Ca influx triggered by glutamate exposure might mediate GNT (Ca hypothesis). A basic test to discriminate between these hypotheses would be to determine the dependence of GNT on the extracellular ionic environment. The excitotoxicity hypothesis predicts that GNT should depend critically on the presence of extracellular Na, since that ion appears to mediate glutamate neuroexcitation in the CNS; the Ca hypothesis predicts that GNT should depend critically on the presence of extracellular Ca. The focus of the present experiments was to determine the effects of several alterations in the extracellular ionic environment upon the serial morphologic changes that occur after mouse neocortical neurons in cell culture receive toxic exposure to glutamate. The results suggest that GNT in cortical neurons can be separated into 2 components distinguishable on the basis of differences in time course and ionic dependence. The first component, marked by neuronal swelling, occurs early, is dependent on extracellular Na and Cl, can be mimicked by high K, and is thus possibly “excitotoxic.” The second component, marked by gradual neuronal disintegration, occurs late, is dependent on extracellular Ca, can be mimicked by A23187, and is thus possibly mediated by a transmembrane influx of Ca. While either component alone is ultimately capable of producing irreversible neuronal injury, the Ca-dependent mechanism predominates at lower exposures to glutamate. Glutamate exposure likely leads to a Ca influx both through glutamate-activated cation channels and through voltage- dependent Ca channels activated by membrane depolarization. Addition of 20 mM Mg, however, did not substantially block GNT; this finding, together with the observation that GNT is largely preserved in sodium- free solution, supports the notion that the activation of voltage- dependent Ca channels may not be required for lethal Ca entry. The possibility that N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors may play a dominant role in mediating glutamate-induced lethal Ca influx is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.07-02-00369.1987

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,802

Metadata

Authors
Choi, D.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1987-02-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
369-379
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2051395367
Cited by
1,802
References
0
FWCI
25.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionic dependence of glutamate neurotoxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.07-02-00369.1987
The paper
Choi, D. (1987). Ionic dependence of glutamate neurotoxicity. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.07-02-00369.1987

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.