The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Glutamate-positive neurons in the somatic sensory cortex of rats and monkeys
Open accessAbstract
The morphology and laminar distribution of neurons labeled with an antiserum prepared against glutamic acid (Glu) conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin have been studied in the somatic sensory cortex of rats and monkeys. In both species, the vast majority of immunostained neurons are pyramidal; some nonpyramidal neurons are also present. Positive neurons are observed in all cortical layers, although variations are found in the percentage of Glu-positive neurons in the different layers. In rats they are most numerous in layer V (36%), followed by layer II (33%), layer III (32%), and layer VI (29%). In layer IV, 13% of all neurons are positive. Immunoreactive neurons are very sparse in layer I. In monkeys, Glu-positive neurons represent 51% of all neurons in layer V, 49% in layer III, 40% in layers II and VI, and 19% in layer IV. No differences are evident in the laminar distribution of Glu-positive neurons among cytoarchitectonic areas 3a, 3b, 1, and 2. As in rats, Glu-positive neurons are very sparse in layer I. Since Glu and GABA metabolisms are closely related, double-labeling experiments were performed in which thin, adjacent paraffin sections were stained alternately with the anti-Glu serum and with an anti-GABA serum. The 2 populations are almost completely segregated, even though a small fraction of neurons (less than 5%) are labeled by the antisera against both antigens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DeFelipe, J., & Fariñas, I. (1992) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(92)90015-7 · Cited by 975
Conti, F., Minelli, A., & Melone, M. (2004) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.03.003 · Cited by 353
Self-citationThe neocortex: An overview of its evolutionary development, structural organization and synaptology
Nieuwenhuys, R. (1994) · Anatomy and Embryology · doi:10.1007/bf00187291 · Cited by 270
Liu, X. B., & Jones, E. G. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.14.7332 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Conti, F., Rustioni, A., Petrusz, P., & Towle, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1987-06-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1887-1901
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1916585012
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glutamate-positive neurons in the somatic sensory cortex of rats and monkeys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.07-06-01887.1987
- The paper
- Conti, F., Rustioni, A., Petrusz, P., & Towle, A. (1987). Glutamate-positive neurons in the somatic sensory cortex of rats and monkeys. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.07-06-01887.1987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.