Cited by 130Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Social Interaction Rescues Memory Deficit in an Animal Model of Alzheimer's Disease by Increasing BDNF-Dependent Hippocampal Neurogenesis

Open access
Hsiao, Ya-Hsin, Hung, Hui-Chi, Chen, Shun-Hua, Gean, Po-Wu·2014·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

It has been recognized that the risk of cognitive decline during aging can be reduced if one maintains strong social connections, yet the neural events underlying this beneficial effect have not been rigorously studied. Here, we show that amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin 1 (PS1) double-transgenic (APP/PS1) mice demonstrate improvement in memory after they are cohoused with wild-type mice. The improvement was associated with increased protein and mRNA levels of BDNF in the hippocampus. Concomitantly, the number of BrdU+/NeuN+cells in the hippocampal dentate gyrus was significantly elevated after cohousing. Methylazoxymethanol acetate, a cell proliferation blocker, markedly reduced BrdU+and BrdU/NeuN+cells and abolished the effect of social interaction. Selective ablation of mitotic neurons using diphtheria toxin (DT) and a retrovirus vector encoding DT receptor abolished the beneficial effect of cohousing. Knockdown of BDNF by shRNA transfection blocked, whereas overexpression of BDNF mimicked the memory-improving effect. A tropomyosin-related kinase B agonist, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone, occluded the effect of social interaction. These results demonstrate that increased BDNF expression and neurogenesis in the hippocampus after cohousing underlie the reversal of memory deficit in APP/PS1 mice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0747-14.2014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 130

Authors
Hsiao, Y.-H., Hung, H.-C., Chen, S.-H., & Gean, P.-W.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Basic Medical Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CN)
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-12-03
Volume
34
Issue
49
Pages
16207-16219
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2073283483
Cited by
130
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
social interaction, Alzheimer's disease, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, hippocampal neurogenesis, memory impairment, APP/PS1 mice, cohousing, dentate gyrus, methylazoxymethanol acetate, diphtheria toxin, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone, TrkB receptor, age-related cognitive decline
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Diphtheria Toxin, Disease Models, Animal, Hippocampus, Housing, Animal, Male, Memory Disorders, Methylazoxymethanol Acetate, Mice, Transgenic, Social Behavior, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Dentate Gyrus, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Flavones, Mice, Presenilin-1, Neurogenesis, Gene Knockdown Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review