The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Retinotopic organization of the developing retinotectal projection in the zebrafish embryo
Open accessAbstract
Developing retinal axons in the zebrafish embryo were stained with HRP or with the fluorescent dyes dil and diO to study the formation of the retinotectal projection. Retinal axons leave the eye at 34–36 hr postfertilization (PF), invade the tectum at 46–48 hr PF, and innervate the tectal neuropil at 70–72 hr PF. Dorsal and ventral axons occupy separate aspects of the optic nerve and tract and pass into their retinotopically appropriate ventral and dorsal hemitectum, respectively. Nasal and temporal axons are segregated in the nerve, mixed in the tract, and are coextensive over the rostral half of tectum until 56 hr PF. They then segregate again, due to the progression of nasal axons into the open caudal tectum. Thus, at 70–72 hr PF, dorsal and ventral as well as temporal and nasal axons occupy their retinotopically appropriate tectal quadrants. After ablation of the temporal retina prior to the time of axonal outgrowth, the nasal axons bypass the vacant rostral tectum to terminate in the caudal tectal half. Temporal axons in the absence of nasal axons remain restricted to their appropriate rostral tectal half, suggesting that nasal and temporal axons possess a preference for their retinotopically appropriate tectal domains. Measurements of individual terminal arbors and the tectal areas in embryos and in adult zebrafish showed that individual arbors are large with respect to the embryonic tectum but are about 14–15 times smaller than in the adult. However, the proportion of tectum covered by embryonic arbors is about 7 times larger than in the adult, suggesting that a higher precision of the adult projection is achieved as a result of a greater enlargement of the tectum than of the arbors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Order in the initial retinotectal map in Xenopus: a new technique for labelling growing nerve fibres
Holt, C. E., & Harris, W. A. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/301150a0 · Cited by 203
Cited by
Wilson, S. W., Ross, L. S., Parrett, T., & Easter, S. S. (1990) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.108.1.121 · Cited by 408
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists disrupt the formation of a mammalian neural map.
Simon, D. K., Prusky, G. T., O'Leary, D. D., & Constantine-Paton, M. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.22.10593 · Cited by 323
Nakamura, H., & O'Leary, D. (1989) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.09-11-03776.1989 · Cited by 273
Early‐eye morphogenesis in the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio
Schmitt, E. A., & Dowling, J. E. (1994) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903440404 · Cited by 257
Real-Time Visualization of Neuronal Activity during Perception
Muto, A., Ohkura, M., Abe, G., Nakai, J., & Kawakami, K. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.12.040 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Stuermer, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1988-12-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4513-4530
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2125430316
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retinotopic organization of the developing retinotectal projection in the zebrafish embryo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.08-12-04513.1988
- The paper
- Stuermer, C. (1988). Retinotopic organization of the developing retinotectal projection in the zebrafish embryo. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.08-12-04513.1988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.