L-dopa modulates functional connectivity in striatal cognitive and motor networks: A double-blind placebo-controlled study
Open accessAbstract
Functional connectivity (FC) analyses of resting-state fMRI data allow for the mapping of large-scale functional networks, and provide a novel means of examining the impact of dopaminergic challenge. Here, using a double-blind, placebo-controlled design, we examined the effect of L-dopa, a dopamine precursor, on striatal resting-state FC in 19 healthy young adults. We examined the FC of 6 striatal regions of interest (ROIs) previously shown to elicit networks known to be associated with motivational, cognitive and motor subdivisions of the caudate and putamen (Di Martino et al., 2008). In addition to replicating the previously demonstrated patterns of striatal FC, we observed robust effects of L-dopa. Specifically, L-dopa increased FC in motor pathways connecting the putamen ROIs with the cerebellum and brainstem. Although L-dopa also increased FC between the inferior ventral striatum and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, it disrupted ventral striatal and dorsal caudate FC with the default mode network. These alterations in FC are consistent with studies that have demonstrated dopaminergic modulation of cognitive and motor striatal networks in healthy participants. Recent studies have demonstrated altered resting state FC in several conditions believed to be characterized by abnormal dopaminergic neurotransmission. Our findings suggest that the application of similar experimental pharmacological manipulations in such populations may further our understanding of the role of dopaminergic neurotransmission in those conditions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patterns of striatal FC obtained for TDC were grossly similar to those previously obtained with TA, though with notably more diffuse and stronger local positive FC.
“Patterns of striatal FC obtained for TDC were grossly similar to those previously obtained with TA (42;44;45) though with notably more diffuse and stronger local positive FC”
From Aberrant Striatal Functional Connectivity in Children with Autism (2011) · cites this paper as [44]
Independent applications of the same approach yielded similar results.
“Independent applications of the same approach yielded similar results (44;45).”
From Aberrant Striatal Functional Connectivity in Children with Autism (2011) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 292
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Zaitsev M Hennig J Speck O 2003 Automated onlnie EPI distortion correction for fMRI applications Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1042 abstract
- Authors
- Kelly, C., de Zubicaray, G., Di Martino, A., Copland, D. A., Reiss, P. T., Klein, D. F., Castellanos, F. X., Milham, M. P., & McMahon, K.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-06-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 7364-7378
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2928147
- OpenAlex
- W2084699651
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 10.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DP0452264)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA024775)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- L-DOPA, dopamine, functional connectivity, striatum, resting-state fMRI, caudate nucleus, putamen, cerebellum, brainstem, default mode network, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dopaminergic modulation, motor network, cognitive networks
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Benserazide, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Corpus Striatum, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Levodopa, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Movement, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Probability, Dopamine Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review