A calorie-restricted diet decreases brain iron accumulation and preserves motor performance in old rhesus monkeys
Open accessAbstract
Caloric restriction (CR) reduces the pathological effects of aging and extends the lifespan in many species, including nonhuman primates, although the effect on the brain is less well characterized. We used two common indicators of aging, motor performance speed and brain iron deposition measured in vivo using MRI, to determine the potential effect of CR on elderly rhesus macaques eating restricted (n = 24; 13 males, 11 females) and standard diets (n = 17; 8 males, 9 females). Both the CR and control monkeys showed age-related increases in iron concentrations in globus pallidus (GP) and substantia nigra (SN), although the CR group had significantly less iron deposition in the GP, SN, red nucleus, and temporal cortex. A diet x age interaction revealed that CR modified age-related brain changes, evidenced as attenuation in the rate of iron accumulation in basal ganglia and parietal, temporal, and perirhinal cortex. Additionally, control monkeys had significantly slower fine motor performance on the Movement Assessment Panel, which was negatively correlated with iron accumulation in left SN and parietal lobe, although CR animals did not show this relationship. Our observations suggest that the CR-induced benefit of reduced iron deposition and preserved motor function may indicate neural protection similar to effects described previously in aging rodent and primate species.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CR delays age-associated muscle dysfunction in D. melanogaster and rhesus monkeys, and delays the onset of sarcopenia in rhesus monkeys.
“Thus, despite the marked LBM reduction following CR in some species, CR delays age-associated muscle dysfunction in D. melanogaster [44] and rhesus monkeys [45], and delays the onset of sarcopenia in the latter [46].”
From Resistance Training Prevents Muscle Loss Induced by Caloric Restriction in Obese Elderly Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [45]
The Results (mMAP Motor Performance; page not provided) show that calorie-restricted rhesus monkeys performed fine motor movements faster than controls on the q-mark task, supporting preserved motor performance. The study did not directly measure muscle dysfunction or establish that its onset was delayed. The sarcopenia claim is attached to a different citation [46], so it is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Kastman, E. K., Willette, A. A., Coe, C. L., Bendlin, B. B., Kosmatka, K. J., McLaren, D. G., Xu, G., Canu, E., Field, A. S., Alexander, A. L., Voytko, M. L., Beasley, T. M., Colman, R. J., Weindruch, R. H., & Johnson, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2010-06-09
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 7940-7947
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2898557
- OpenAlex
- W2055184550
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (RR000167, AG11915, AG000213, P51OD011106)
- National Institute on Aging (P01-AG-11915, AG-000213, R01AG043125, P01AG011915, T32AG000213)
- National Center for Research Resources (C06RR020141, C06RR015459, P51RR000167)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological diseases and metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- caloric restriction, brain iron accumulation, aging, rhesus monkeys, motor performance, globus pallidus, substantia nigra, basal ganglia, red nucleus, temporal cortex
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Basal Ganglia, Brain, Female, Globus Pallidus, Iron, Macaca mulatta, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Activity, Movement, Parietal Lobe, Red Nucleus, Substantia Nigra, Temporal Lobe, Caloric Restriction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review