Cited by 24Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Synaptic Scaling and the Development of a Motor Network

Open access
Knogler, L. D., Liao, M., Drapeau, P.·2010·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Neurons respond homeostatically to chronic changes in network activity with compensatory changes such as a uniform alteration in the size of miniature postsynaptic current (mPSC) amplitudes termed synaptic scaling. However, little is known about the impact of synaptic scaling on the function of neural networks in vivo. We used the embryonic zebrafish to address the effect of synaptic scaling on the neural network underlying locomotion. Activity was decreased during development by TTX injection to block action potentials or CNQX injection to block glutamatergic transmission. Alternatively TNFalpha was chronically applied. Recordings from spinal neurons showed that glutamatergic mPSCs scaled up approximately 25% after activity reduction and fortuitously scaled down approximately 20% after TNFalpha treatment, and were unchanged following blockade of neuromuscular activity alone with alpha-bungarotoxin. Regardless of the direction of scaling, immediately following reversal of treatment no chronic effect was distinguishable in motoneuron activity patterns or in swimming behavior. We also acutely induced a similar increase of glutamatergic mPSC amplitudes using cyclothiazide to reduce AMPA receptor desensitization or decrease of glutamatergic mPSC amplitudes using a low concentration of CNQX to partially block AMPA receptors. Though the strength of the motor output was altered, neither chronic nor acute treatments disrupted the patterning of synaptic activity or swimming. Our results show, for the first time, that scaling of glutamatergic synapses can be induced in vivo in the zebrafish and that synaptic patterning is less plastic than synaptic strength during development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0880-10.2010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During embryonic and early postnatal development, homeostatic mechanisms can ensure that spontaneous activity is present in developing spinal circuits.

    “For example, during embryonic and early postnatal development, homeostatic mechanisms can ensure that spontaneous activity is present in developing spinal circuits (Gonzalez-Islas and Wenner 2006;Knogler et al. 2010), where such activity is vital for driving proper circuit connectivity (Hanson and Landmesser 2004).”

    From Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity: Local and Global Mechanisms for Stabilizing Neuronal Function (2012) · cites this paper as Knogler et al. 2010

    The Behavioral consequences section reports recovery of spontaneous activity in embryonic chick spinal circuits through mechanisms that include synaptic scaling. The paper also finds homeostatic synaptic changes in developing zebrafish, but says their motor-activity patterning can persist without homeostasis. Our copy does not establish the claim for early postnatal spinal circuits. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knogler, L. D., Liao, M., & Drapeau, P.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Drapeau, P.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-06-30
Volume
30
Issue
26
Pages
8871-8881
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2085297861
Cited by
24
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
synaptic scaling, homeostatic plasticity, miniature postsynaptic currents, glutamatergic synapses, locomotion, zebrafish embryos, spinal motoneurons, AMPA receptor desensitization, TNF-α, synaptic plasticity, swimming behavior
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Motor Neurons, Neural Pathways, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Swimming, Synapses, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Zebrafish, Receptors, AMPA, Muscle, Skeletal, Glutamic Acid, Synaptic Potentials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review