Conflicts between local and global spatial frameworks dissociate neural representations of the lateral and medial entorhinal cortex
Open accessAbstract
Manipulation of spatial reference frames is a common experimental tool to investigate the nature of hippocampal information coding and to investigate high-order processes, such as cognitive coordination. However, it is unknown how the hippocampus afferents represent the local and global reference frames of an environment. To address these issues, single units were recorded in freely moving rats with multi-tetrode arrays targeting the superficial layers of the lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC) and medial entorhinal cortex (MEC), the two primary cortical inputs to the hippocampus. Rats ran clockwise laps around a circular track partitioned into quadrants covered by different textures (the local reference frame). The track was centered in a circular environment with distinct landmarks on the walls (the global reference frame). Here we demonstrate a novel dissociation between MEC and LEC in that the global frame controlled the MEC representation and the local frame controlled the LEC representation when the reference frames were rotated in equal, but opposite, directions. Consideration of the functional anatomy of the hippocampal circuit and popular models of attractor dynamics in CA3 suggests a mechanistic explanation of previous data showing a dissociation between the CA3 and CA1 regions in their responses to this local-global conflict. Furthermore, these results are consistent with a model of the LEC providing the hippocampus with the external sensory content of an experience and the MEC providing the spatial context, which combine to form conjunctive codes in the hippocampus that form the basis of episodic memory.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent behavioral and electrophysiological evidence indicates that both LEC and MEC process spatial information, with local and global spatial frameworks being represented within LEC and MEC, respectively.
“Yet, recent behavioral and electrophysiological evidence indicates that both LEC and MEC process spatial information, with local and global spatial frameworks being represented within LEC and MEC, respectively (Knierim et al., 2014; Neunuebel et al., 2013).”
From The medial prefrontal cortex - hippocampus circuit that integrates information of object, place and time to construct episodic memory in rodents: Behavioral, anatomical and neurochemical properties (2020) · cites this paper as Neunuebel et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 126
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Squire LR Memory and brain 1987 Oxford UP Oxford
- Authors
- Neunuebel, J. P., Yoganarasimha, D., Rao, G., & Knierim, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2013-05-29
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 9246-9258
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3747988
- OpenAlex
- W2001270585
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32NS007467, T32NS07467, R01 NS39456, R01NS039456)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- entorhinal cortex, lateral entorhinal cortex, medial entorhinal cortex, spatial reference frames, hippocampal afferents, hippocampal circuitry, episodic memory, spatial representation, single-unit recording
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cognition, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Male, Membrane Potentials, Microelectrodes, Neurons, Space Perception, Entorhinal Cortex, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats, Electrophysiological Phenomena, CA1 Region, Hippocampal, CA3 Region, Hippocampal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review