The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ATP-activated channels in rat and bullfrog sensory neurons: concentration dependence and kinetics
Open accessAbstract
The concentration dependence and kinetics of ionic currents activated by extracellular adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) were studied in voltage-clamped dorsal root ganglion neurons from rats and bullfrogs. About 40% of neurons of both species responded to ATP with an increase in membrane conductance. The ATP-activated currents were similar in the 2 species, except that currents in rat neurons desensitized faster. In bullfrog neurons, the conductance was half-maximally activated by about 3 microM ATP; at low concentrations, the conductance increased 3- to 7- fold for a doubling in [ATP], suggesting that several ATP molecules must bind in order to activate the current. A steeper concentration- response relationship than expected from 1:1 binding was also seen in rat neurons. The current activated quickly upon application of ATP and decayed quickly when ATP was removed. Activation kinetics were faster at higher [ATP], with time constants decreasing from about 200 msec at 0.3 microM ATP to about 10 msec at 100 microM ATP. Deactivation kinetics (tau approximately 100–200 msec) were independent of the ATP concentration. The rapid activation and deactivation make it seem likely that the ATP-activated current is mediated by direct ligand binding rather than by a second-messenger system. The experimental observations can be mimicked by a simple model in which ATP must bind to 3 identical, noninteracting sites in order to activate a channel. The potency and kinetics of ATP action were voltage-dependent, with hyperpolarization slowing deactivation and increasing ATP's potency. Deactivation kinetics were also sensitive to the concentration of external Ca, becoming faster in higher Ca.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamill, O. P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B., & Sigworth, F. J. (1981) · Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/bf00656997 · Cited by 18,436
Cited by
Molecular Physiology of P2X Receptors
North, R. A. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00015.2002 · Cited by 2,919
Signal transduction via P2-purinergic receptors for extracellular ATP and other nucleotides
Dubyak, G. R., & el-Moatassim, C. (1993) · American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.1993.265.3.c577 · Cited by 1,237
Purinoceptors: Are there families of P2X and P2Y purinoceptors?
Abbracchio, M. P., & Burnstock, G. (1994) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/0163-7258(94)00048-4 · Cited by 1,083
A P2X purinoceptor expressed by a subset of sensory neurons
Chen, C.-C., Akopian, A. N., Sivilottit, L., Colquhoun, D., Burnstock, G., & Wood, J. N. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377428a0 · Cited by 1,016
Distinct ATP receptors on pain-sensing and stretch-sensing neurons
Cook, S. P., Vulchanova, L., Hargreaves, K. M., Elde, R., & McCleskey, E. W. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387505a0 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Bean, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1990-01-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2152216921
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ATP-activated channels in rat and bullfrog sensory neurons: concentration dependence and kinetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.10-01-00001.1990
- The paper
- Bean, B. (1990). ATP-activated channels in rat and bullfrog sensory neurons: concentration dependence and kinetics. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.10-01-00001.1990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.