Cited by 498Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in abstract state-based inference during decision making in humans

Open access
Hampton, Alan N., Bossaerts, Peter, O’Doherty, John P.·2006·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Many real-life decision-making problems incorporate higher-order structure, involving interdependencies between different stimuli, actions, and subsequent rewards. It is not known whether brain regions implicated in decision making, such as the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), use a stored model of the task structure to guide choice (model-based decision making) or merely learn action or state values without assuming higher-order structure as in standard reinforcement learning. To discriminate between these possibilities, we scanned human subjects with functional magnetic resonance imaging while they performed a simple decision-making task with higher-order structure, probabilistic reversal learning. We found that neural activity in a key decision-making region, the vmPFC, was more consistent with a computational model that exploits higher-order structure than with simple reinforcement learning. These results suggest that brain regions, such as the vmPFC, use an abstract model of task structure to guide behavioral choice, computations that may underlie the human capacity for complex social interactions and abstract strategizing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1010-06.2006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In previous studies on healthy adults, neural correlates of RPEs in probabilistic reversal learning tasks positively correlated with striatal and ventromedial prefrontal areas and negatively correlated with dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and anterior insula.

    “The neural correlates of RPEs in probabilistic reversal learning tasks have been successfully examined in previous studies on healthy adults and found to positively correlate with mainly striatal and ventromedial prefrontal areas, and to negatively correlate with areas such as the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and the anterior insula (Gläscher et al., 2009; Hampton et al., 2006; Hauser et al., 201”
  • There is much work in humans, nonhuman primates, and rodents suggesting that ventral orbitofrontal cortex plays a key role in representing the values that underpin goal-directed control.

    “Indeed, there has been much work in humans, nonhuman primates, and rodents suggesting that this region plays a key role in representing the sort of values that underpin goal-directed control (Daw et al., 2006b; Gottfried and Dolan, 2004; Hampton et al., 2006; Padoa-Schioppa and Assad, 2006; Schoenbaum and Roesch, 2005; Thorpe et al., 1983).”

    From Goals and Habits in the Brain (2013) · cites this paper as Hampton et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 498

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Luce DR (2003) Response times. New York: Oxford UP.

Authors
Hampton, A. N., Bossaerts, P., & O’Doherty, J. P.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-08-09
Volume
26
Issue
32
Pages
8360-8367
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2041639631
Cited by
498
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 34
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • California Institute of Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
ventromedial prefrontal cortex, model-based decision making, probabilistic reversal learning, reinforcement learning, decision-making, social cognition
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Decision Making, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reversal Learning, Task Performance and Analysis, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review