Cited by 168Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Intrinsic organization of the anesthetized brain

Open access
Liang, Zhifeng, King, Jean, Zhang, Nanyin·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The neural mechanism of unconsciousness has been a major unsolved question in neuroscience despite its vital role in brain states like coma and anesthesia. The existing literature suggests that neural connections, information integration, and conscious states are closely related. Indeed, alterations in several important neural circuitries and networks during unconscious conditions have been reported. However, how the whole-brain network is topologically reorganized to support different patterns of information transfer during unconscious states remains unknown. Here we directly compared whole-brain neural networks in awake and anesthetized states in rodents. Consistent with our previous report, the awake rat brain was organized in a nontrivial manner and conserved fundamental topological properties in a way similar to the human brain. Strikingly, these topological features were well maintained in the anesthetized brain. Local neural networks in the anesthetized brain were reorganized with altered local network properties. The connectional strength between brain regions was also considerably different between the awake and anesthetized conditions. Interestingly, we found that long-distance connections were not preferentially reduced in the anesthetized condition, arguing against the hypothesis that loss of long-distance connections is characteristic to unconsciousness. These findings collectively show that the integrity of the whole-brain network can be conserved between widely dissimilar physiologic states while local neural networks can flexibly adapt to new conditions. They also illustrate that the governing principles of intrinsic brain organization might represent fundamental characteristics of the healthy brain. With the unique spatial and temporal scales of resting-state fMRI, this study has opened a new avenue for understanding the neural mechanism of (un)consciousness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1020-12.2012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rats, isoflurane causes some networks to reorganize while certain global network properties remain.

    “isoflurane anesthesia induces an organizational shift of particular networks in the rat brain, while maintaining certain global network features [135].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [135]

  • In rats under isoflurane, neuroimaging showed that cortex and striatum become functionally disconnected during general anesthesia.

    “a neuroimaging study of isoflurane in rats demonstrated functional disconnections between cortex and the striatum during general anesthesia [135].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [135]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 168

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Paul G Barash BFC Robert K Stoelting Cahalan M Michael Christine Stock Clinical Anesthesia 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 6 Edition

Authors
Liang, Z., King, J., & Zhang, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Nanyin
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-07-25
Volume
32
Issue
30
Pages
10183-10191
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2099875458
Cited by
168
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA025690, R01DA021846)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
brain network topology, anesthesia, loss of consciousness, whole-brain connectivity, local neural networks, long-distance connections, resting-state fMRI, rats, consciousness, brain reorganization
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Consciousness, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Isoflurane, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review