Methamphetamine causes microglial activation in the brains of human abusers
Open accessAbstract
Methamphetamine is a popular addictive drug whose use is associated with multiple neuropsychiatric adverse events and toxic to the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems of the brain. Methamphetamine-induced neuropathology is associated with increased expression of microglial cells that are thought to participate in either pro-toxic or protective mechanisms in the brain. Although reactive microgliosis has been observed in animal models of methamphetamine neurotoxicity, no study has reported on the status of microglial activation in human methamphetamine abusers. The present study reports on 12 abstinent methamphetamine abusers and 12 age-, gender-, and education-matched control subjects who underwent positron emission tomography using a radiotracer for activated microglia, [(11)C](R)-(1-[2-chlorophenyl]-N-methyl-N-[1-methylpropyl]-3-isoquinoline carboxamide) ([(11)C](R)-PK11195). Compartment analysis was used to estimate quantitative levels of binding potentials of [(11)C](R)-PK11195 in brain regions with dopaminergic and/or serotonergic innervation. The mean levels of [(11)C](R)-PK11195 binding were higher in methamphetamine abusers than those in control subjects in all brain regions (>250% higher; p < 0.01 for all). In addition, the binding levels in the midbrain, striatum, thalamus, and orbitofrontal and insular cortices (p < 0.05) correlated inversely with the duration of methamphetamine abstinence. These results suggest that chronic self-administration of methamphetamine can cause reactive microgliosis in the brains of human methamphetamine abusers, a level of activation that appears to subside over longer periods of abstinence.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microglia activation was observed at least 2 years after Meth abstinence.
“Strikingly, microglia activation was observed at least 2 years after Meth abstinence.”
From Stress- and Glucocorticoid-Induced Priming of Neuroinflammatory Responses: Potential Mechanisms of Stress-Induced Vulnerability to Drugs of Abuse (2011) · cites this paper as Sekine et al., 2008
Microglial activation was elevated in several brain regions including the striatum in long-term Meth users.
“Of note, a study in humans demonstrated that microglial activation was elevated in several brain regions including the striatum in long-term Meth users (Sekine et al., 2008).”
From Stress- and Glucocorticoid-Induced Priming of Neuroinflammatory Responses: Potential Mechanisms of Stress-Induced Vulnerability to Drugs of Abuse (2011) · cites this paper as Sekine et al., 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 381
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (1997) Structured clinical interview for the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, patient version. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric.
- Authors
- Sekine, Y., Ouchi, Y., Sugihara, G., Takei, N., Yoshikawa, E., Nakamura, K., Iwata, Y., Tsuchiya, K. J., Suda, S., Suzuki, K., Kawai, M., Takebayashi, K., Yamamoto, S., Matsuzaki, H., Ueki, T., Mori, N., Gold, M. S., & Cadet, J. L.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (JP)
- Hamamatsu Photonics (Japan) (JP)
- University of Florida Health (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2008-05-28
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 5756-5761
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2491906
- OpenAlex
- W2098139332
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 10.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (Z01DA000494)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Keywords
- methamphetamine, microglial activation, reactive microgliosis, PK11195, [11C]PK11195 PET, dopaminergic system, serotonergic system, drug abstinence, methamphetamine neurotoxicity, binding potential, striatum, midbrain, orbitofrontal cortex, insula
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Antineoplastic Agents, Brain, Brain Mapping, Carbon Isotopes, Female, Humans, Isoquinolines, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Methamphetamine, Protein Binding, Case-Control Studies, Microglia, Amphetamine-Related Disorders, Positron-Emission Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review