Perceived Controllability Modulates the Neural Response to Pain
Open accessAbstract
The response to painful stimulation depends not only on peripheral nociceptive input but also on the cognitive and affective context in which pain occurs. One contextual variable that affects the neural and behavioral response to nociceptive stimulation is the degree to which pain is perceived to be controllable. Previous studies indicate that perceived controllability affects pain tolerance, learning and motivation, and the ability to cope with intractable pain, suggesting that it has profound effects on neural pain processing. To date, however, no neuroimaging studies have assessed these effects. We manipulated the subjects' belief that they had control over a nociceptive stimulus, while the stimulus itself was held constant. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that pain that was perceived to be controllable resulted in attenuated activation in the three neural areas most consistently linked with pain processing: the anterior cingulate, insular, and secondary somatosensory cortices. This suggests that activation at these sites is modulated by cognitive variables, such as perceived controllability, and that pain imaging studies may therefore overestimate the degree to which these responses are stimulus driven and generalizable across cognitive contexts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Providing control or inducing perceived control reduces experienced intensity of painful stimuli.
“A number of studies employing painful stimuli have found that providing control, or inducing perceived control, reduces the experienced intensity of the painful stimulus.”
From Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. (2016) · cites this paper as Salomons, Johnstone, Backonja, & Davidson, 2004
The Behavioral results report virtually identical pain ratings in the uncontrollable and controllable conditions (7.19 versus 7.20), with no significant difference. The Discussion says the neural-activity differences were not attributable to a difference in perceived pain. Thus, this study does not find that perceived control reduced experienced pain intensity. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPerceived control in pain studies increases vmPFC activity.
“Moreover, perceived control in these pain studies increases ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity (Salomons, Johnstone, Backonja, & Davidson, 2004).”
From Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. (2016) · cites this paper as Salomons, Johnstone, Backonja, & Davidson, 2004
The fMRI section defines the reported contrast as uncontrollable minus controllable pain (UC − C). Table 1 lists prefrontal activation under that contrast, indicating greater activity with perceived uncontrollability, not an increase with perceived control. The paper does not identify a vmPFC increase. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 253
- Authors
- Salomons, T. V., Johnstone, T., Backonja, M.-M., & Davidson, R. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davidson, Richard J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2004-08-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 7199-7203
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6729173
- OpenAlex
- W2149150934
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH069315, MH069315)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- perceived controllability, pain perception, pain processing, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, secondary somatosensory cortex, nociception, pain tolerance, pain coping, cognitive modulation of pain
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cues, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pain, Somatosensory Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review