Cited by 87Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Neuronal activity within the nucleus basalis and conditioned neocortical electroencephalographic activation

Open access
Whalen, PJ, Kapp, BS, Pascoe, JP·1994·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The relationship between neuronal activity within the nucleus basalis (NB) and conditioned neocortical EEG activation was investigated in New Zealand rabbits during Pavlovian differential conditioning. Twenty-seven of 56 neurons recorded in conditioned animals demonstrated a significantly greater change in activity to a tone (CS+) that predicted the occurrence of a mildly aversive unconditioned stimulus when compared to a tone (CS-) that did not. Twenty-four of these 27 neurons demonstrated a significant increase in activity to the CS+ compared to the CS-, while the remaining three neurons demonstrated a significant decrease in activity to the CS+ compared to the CS-. In 24 of these 27 neurons (89%) these changes in neuronal activity during CS presentations correlated significantly with a decrease in the power of delta activity in the EEG. In addition, 13 of these 24 neurons (54%) demonstrated significant correlations between neuronal activity and the power of delta activity during CS-free periods. In experimentally naive animals, the activity of 10 of 22 neurons (45%) recorded within the region of the NB correlated with the power of delta activity in the EEG during stimulus-free periods. These results complement a growing body of evidence and provide strong support for the hypothesis that the NB contributes to neocortical activation in the conscious animal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.14-03-01623.1994

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 87

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Riekkinen PJ, Riekkinen P Jr, Paljarvi L, Soininen H, Halonen T, Reinikainen K, Partanen J (1990) Relationship between cholin- ergic pathology and EEG slowing. In: Key topics in brain research. Alzheimer's disease: epidemiology, neuropathology, neurochemistry, clinics (Riederen P, Beckman H, eds), pp 437-445. Berlin: Springer.

Authors
Whalen, P., Kapp, B., & Pascoe, J.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1994-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
1623-1633
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1503776348
Cited by
87
References
52
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (9010760)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
nucleus basalis of Meynert, neuronal activity, conditioned stimulus, unconditioned stimulus, neocortex, rabbits, aversive conditioning
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Basal Ganglia, Cerebral Cortex, Conditioning, Classical, Electroencephalography, Neurons, Rabbits, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review