Lateral Intraparietal Cortex and Reinforcement Learning during a Mixed-Strategy Game
Open accessAbstract
Activity of the neurons in the lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) displays a mixture of sensory, motor, and memory signals. Moreover, they often encode signals reflecting the accumulation of sensory evidence that certain eye movements might lead to a desirable outcome. However, when the environment changes dynamically, animals are also required to combine the information about its previously chosen actions and their outcomes appropriately to update continually the desirabilities of alternative actions. Here, we investigated whether LIP neurons encoded signals necessary to update an animal's decision-making strategies adaptively during a computer-simulated matching-pennies game. Using a reinforcement learning algorithm, we estimated the value functions that best predicted the animal's choices on a trial-by-trial basis. We found that, immediately before the animal revealed its choice, ∼18% of LIP neurons changed their activity according to the difference in the value functions for the two targets. In addition, a somewhat higher fraction of LIP neurons displayed signals related to the sum of the value functions, which might correspond to the state value function or an average rate of reward used as a reference point. Similar to the neurons in the prefrontal cortex, many LIP neurons also encoded the signals related to the animal's previous choices. Thus, the posterior parietal cortex might be a part of the network that provides the substrate for forming appropriate associations between actions and outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neural activity in all three cortical areas carries the information of past reward events.
“Neural activity in all three cortical areas carries the information of past reward events19-22.”
From A reservoir of time constants for memory traces in cortical neurons (2011) · cites this paper as [21]
Although the overall performance of monkeys was nearly optimal, their trial-by-trial decisions, locally in time, were influenced by previous rewards and actions.
“Although the overall performance of monkeys was nearly optimal, their trial-by-trial decisions, locally in time, were influenced by previous rewards and actions11,19-22.”
From A reservoir of time constants for memory traces in cortical neurons (2011) · cites this paper as [21]
In the matching pennies task, the animals made their decisions largely on the basis of their reward history.
“Although the global optimal strategy for the matching pennies task is to choose randomly and therefore does not require memory, the animals made their decisions largely on the basis of their reward history11,19-22.”
From A reservoir of time constants for memory traces in cortical neurons (2011) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 125
- Authors
- Seo, H., Barraclough, D. J., & Lee, D.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- University of Rochester (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Daeyeol
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-06-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 7278-7289
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2743508
- OpenAlex
- W2083828303
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH073246, R01MH073246)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- reinforcement learning, mixed strategy game, matching pennies, state value function, action-outcome associations, decision-making, posterior parietal cortex, prefrontal cortex
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Algorithms, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Female, Games, Experimental, Macaca mulatta, Male, Memory, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Psychomotor Performance, Regression Analysis, Reinforcement, Psychology, Saccades
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review