Lesions of the medial striatum in monkeys produce perseverative impairments during reversal learning similar to those produced by lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex
Open accessAbstract
The ability to switch responding between two visual stimuli based on their changing relationship with reward is dependent on the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). OFC lesions in humans, monkeys, and rats disrupt performance on a common test of this ability, the visual serial discrimination reversal task. This finding is of particular significance to our understanding of psychiatric disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and schizophrenia, in which behavioral inflexibility is a prominent symptom. Although OFC dysfunction can occur in these disorders, there is considerable evidence for more widespread dysfunction within frontostriatal and frontoamygdalar circuitry. Because the contribution of these subcortical structures to behavioral flexibility is poorly understood, the present study compared the effects of excitotoxic lesions of the medial striatum (MS), amygdala, and OFC in the marmoset monkey on performance of the serial reversal task. All monkeys were able to learn a novel stimulus-reward association but, compared with both control and amygdala-lesioned monkeys, those with MS or OFC lesions showed a perseverative impairment in their ability to reverse this association. However, whereas both MS and OFC groups showed insensitivity to negative feedback, only OFC-lesioned monkeys showed insensitivity to positive feedback. These findings suggest that, for different reasons, both the MS and OFC support behavioral flexibility after changes in reward contingencies, and are consistent with the hypothesis that striatal and OFC dysfunction can contribute to pathological perseveration.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In marmosets, impairments in reversal learning can be induced by lesions to the OFC and the medial striatum and selective 5-HT depletion in the OFC.
“In marmosets, impairments in reversal learning can be induced by lesions to the OFC (Dias et al., 1996) and the medial striatum (Clarke et al., 2008) and selective 5-HT depletion in the OFC (Clarke et al., 2005).”
From The role of habit in compulsivity (2016) · cites this paper as Clarke et al., 2008
Reversal paradigms have high translational value because they can be used with minor variations across species including humans, monkeys, and rodents.
“Reversal paradigms have high translational value because they can be used with minor variations in different species, including humans (Fellows & Farah 2003, Hornak et al 2004), monkeys (Clarke et al 2008, Crofts et al 1999, Izquierdo et al 2004, Walker et al 2009), and rodents (Bissonette & Powell 2012, Boulougouris et al 2007, Jentsch & Taylor 2001, Schoenbaum et al 2000).”
From Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease (2018) · cites this paper as Clarke et al 2008
PFo lesions cause a deficit in using positive feedback, but not in the use of negative feedback.
“These findings indicate that PFo lesions cause a deficit in using positive feedback, but not in the use of negative feedback (91, but cf. 94).”
From Localization of Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder: Prefrontal Cortex and Amygdala (2011) · cites this paper as [94]
Similar findings on PFo lesion inefficiency in positive feedback have been reported in marmoset monkeys.
“Similar findings have been reported in marmoset monkeys (94).”
From Localization of Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder: Prefrontal Cortex and Amygdala (2011) · cites this paper as [94]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 263
- Authors
- Clarke, H. F., Robbins, T. W., & Roberts, A. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2008-10-22
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 10972-10982
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3981993
- OpenAlex
- W2105791633
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Wellcome Trust (076274/Z04/Z, 089589, 093875)
- University of Cambridge
- Medical Research Council
- Newnham College, University of Cambridge
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- perseveration, reversal learning, medial striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, behavioral flexibility, negative feedback, positive feedback, excitotoxic lesions, marmoset monkey, obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, reward contingency
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Callithrix, Corpus Striatum, Discrimination Learning, Extinction, Psychological, Female, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reversal Learning, Reward, Quinolinic Acid, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review