Tiam1 is Critical for Glutamatergic Synapse Structure and Function in the Hippocampus
Open accessAbstract
Mounting evidence suggests numerous glutamatergic synapse subtypes exist in the brain, and that these subtypes are likely defined by unique molecular regulatory mechanisms. Recent work has identified substantial divergence of molecular composition between commonly studied Schaffer collateral synapses and perforant path–dentate gyrus (DG) synapses of the hippocampus. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that may confer unique properties to perforant path–DG synapses. Here we investigate whether the RhoGEF (Rho guanine–nucleotide exchange factor) protein Tiam1 plays a unique role in the regulation of glutamatergic synapses in dentate granule neurons using a combination of molecular, electrophysiological, and imaging approaches in rat entorhino-hippocampal slices of both sexes. We find that inhibition of Tiam1 function in dentate granule neurons reduces synaptic AMPA receptor function and causes dendritic spines to adopt an elongated filopodia-like morphology. We also find that Tiam1's support of perforant path–DG synapse function is dependent on its GEF domain and identify a potential role for the auto-inhibitory PH domain of Tiam1 in regulating Tiam1 function at these synapses. In marked contrast, reduced Tiam1 expression in CA1 pyramidal neurons produced no effect on glutamatergic synapse development. Together, these data identify a critical role for Tiam1 in the hippocampus and reveal a unique Tiam1-mediated molecular program of glutamatergic synapse regulation in dentate granule neurons. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Several lines of evidence independently point to the molecular diversity of glutamatergic synapses in the brain. Rho guanine–nucleotide exchange factor (RhoGEF) proteins as powerful modulators of glutamatergic synapse function have also become increasingly appreciated in recent years. Here we investigate the synaptic regulatory role of the RhoGEF protein Tiam1, whose expression appears to be remarkably enriched in granule neurons of the dentate gyrus. We find that Tiam1 plays a critical role in the development of glutamatergic perforant path–dentate gyrus synapses, but not in commonly studied in Schaffer collateral–CA1 synapses. Together, these data reveal a unique RhoGEF-mediated molecular program of glutamatergic synapse regulation in dentate granule neurons.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Expression levels of Tiam1 in the CA1 region of the hippocampus are very low, and deleting Tiam1 has no effect on synaptic transmission.
“A caveat to this proposal is that the expression levels of Tiam1 in the CA1 region of the hippocampus are very low and deleting Tiam1 has no effect on synaptic transmission (320).”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [320]
The CA1 neurotransmission section reports low Tiam1 expression and no detectable change in AMPAR- or NMDAR-mediated currents after Tiam1 shRNA knockdown. The Discussion likewise limits the finding to baseline glutamatergic transmission at Schaffer collateral–CA1 synapses. The claim says Tiam1 was deleted and extends the result to synaptic transmission generally; the cited experiment tested knockdown, not deletion. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe Tiam1 mechanism may be involved in the dentate gyrus, where Tiam1 expression is high and does contribute to synaptic transmission.
“However, such a mechanism may well be involved in the dentate gyrus, where Tiam1 expression is high and does contribute to synaptic transmission (320).”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [320]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Matsuzaki, M., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., Nemoto, T., Miyashita, Y., Iino, M., & Kasai, H. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn736 · Cited by 1,563 · cited 9× · see citing works
“Together, our findings strongly suggest that reducing Tiam1 expression in DG granule neurons decreases the number of glutamatergic synapses that express AMPARs.”
BackgroundInfluentialPenzes, P., Beeser, A., Chernoff, J., Schiller, M. R., Eipper, B. A., Mains, R. E., & Huganir, R. L. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01168-6 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Kalirin-7 Controls Activity-Dependent Structural and Functional Plasticity of Dendritic Spines
Xie, Z., Srivastava, D. P., Photowala, H., Kai, L., Cahill, M. E., Woolfrey, K. M., Shum, C. Y., Surmeier, D. J., & Penzes, P. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.005 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Crystal structure of Rac1 in complex with the guanine nucleotide exchange region of Tiam1
Worthylake, D. K., Rossman, K. L., & Sondek, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35047014 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
De Rubeis, S., Pasciuto, E., Li, K. W., Fernández, E., Di Marino, D., Buzzi, A., Ostroff, L. E., Klann, E., Zwartkruis, F. J. T., Komiyama, N. H., et al. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.039 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Margolis, S. S., Salogiannis, J., Lipton, D. M., Mandel-Brehm, C., Wills, Z. P., Mardinly, A. R., Hu, L., Greer, P. L., Bikoff, J. B., Ho, H.-Y. H., et al. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.038 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Reciprocal Activation within a Kinase-Effector Complex Underlying Persistence of Structural LTP
Saneyoshi, T., Matsuno, H., Suzuki, A., Murakoshi, H., Hedrick, N. G., Agnello, E., O’Connell, R., Stratton, M. M., Yasuda, R., & Hayashi, Y. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.012 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nicoll, R. A., & Schulman, H. (2023) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00034.2022 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rao, S., Kay, Y., & Herring, B. E.
- Affiliations
- Department of Biological Sciences (RU)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2019-10-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 9306-9315
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6867819
- OpenAlex
- W2979800294
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- McKnight Foundation
- University of Southern California
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- National Institute of Mental Health (R00MH103398, K99MH103398)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS112480)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- Tiam1, RhoGEF, glutamatergic synapses, dentate gyrus granule cells, dendritic spines, Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses, hippocampus, synaptic development
- MeSH terms
- T-Lymphoma Invasion and Metastasis-inducing Protein 1, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Organ Culture Techniques, Synapses, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Glutamic Acid, Dentate Gyrus, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review