Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potentiation of neuronal NMDA response induced by dehydroepiandrosterone and its suppression by progesterone: effects mediated via sigma receptors

Open access
Bergeron, R, de Montigny, C, Debonnel, G·1996·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

We have shown previously that low doses of selective sigma (sigma)- receptor ligands potentiate the excitatory response of pyramidal neurons to NMDA in the CA3 region of the dorsal hippocampus in the rat. Because progesterone competitively displaces the binding of the ligand N-[3H]allyl-normetazocine (SKF-10,047), the present studies were undertaken to determine in vivo the effect of neuroactive steroids on NMDA-induced excitation of rat CA3 pyramidal neurons. Low doses of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) potentiated the NMDA response selectively and dose-dependently. The effect of DHEA was reversed by the selective sigma antagonist N-dipropyl-2-(4-methoxy-3- (2-phenylethoxy)phenyl)- ethylamine monohydrochloride (NE-100) and by haloperidol, but not by spiperone. Progesterone had no effect by itself but reversed, at low doses, the potentiation of the NMDA response induced by DHEA as well as those induced by nonsteroidal sigma ligands. Neither pregnenolone nor pregnenolone sulfate had any effect on the NMDA response--nor did they antagonize the potentiation of the NMDA response induced by DHEA and by nonsteroidal sigma ligands. A pertussis toxin pretreatment, which inactivates Gi/o-proteins, abolished the potentiating effects of DHEA. Ovariectomy enhanced the potentiation of the NMDA response by the nonsteroidal sigma ligand di(2-tolyl)guanidine (DTG). There was a reciprocal occlusion of the effects of DHEA and DTG; DTG did not potentiate the NMDA response further after DHEA, and DHEA did not do so after DTG. These results suggest that some neuroactive steroids modulate the NMDA response via sigma receptors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.16-03-01193.1996

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Bergeron, R., de Montigny, C., & Debonnel, G.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1996-02-01
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
1193-1202
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1574849955
Cited by
299
References
1
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potentiation of neuronal NMDA response induced by dehydroepiandrosterone and its suppression by progesterone: effects mediated via sigma receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.16-03-01193.1996
The paper
Bergeron, R., de Montigny, C., & Debonnel, G. (1996). Potentiation of neuronal NMDA response induced by dehydroepiandrosterone and its suppression by progesterone: effects mediated via sigma receptors. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.16-03-01193.1996

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.