Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use-Dependent Exaggeration of Neuronal Injury after Unilateral Sensorimotor Cortex Lesions

Open access
Kozlowski, Dorothy A., James, Debra C., Schallert, Timothy·1996·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Unilateral injury to the forelimb representation area of the sensorimotor cortex (FL-SMC) in adult rats causes over-reliance on the unimpaired forelimb for postural-motor movements, as well as overgrowth of layer V pyramidal cell dendrites in the homotopic cortex of the noninjured hemisphere. The overgrowth appears to be use-dependent because it can be prevented by restricting movements of the unimpaired forelimb. Additionally, restricting the unimpaired forelimb in animals with FL-SMC damage results in significantly greater behavioral dysfunction when examined 2 d after cast removal (compared to that after impaired-limb immobilization, or no limb immobilization). In the present study, the long-term behavioral and anatomical effects of limb immobilization were examined. Animals with FL-SMC lesions were fitted with casts immediately after the lesion that immobilized the impaired forelimb, the unimpaired forelimb, or neither forelimb for 15 d. Immobilization of the nonimpaired forelimb resulted in chronic prevention of dendritic growth and severe and chronic behavioral deficits. In addition, immobilization of the nonimpaired forelimb resulted in a dramatic exaggeration of the neuronal injury, presumably attributable to forced overuse of the impaired limb. Immobilization of the impaired forelimb resulted in no detectable neural changes and in only slightly increased and longer-lasting behavioral asymmetries (compared to nonimmobilized, lesioned animals), presumably attributable to mild disuse of the impaired limb. Immobilization of a single forelimb in nonlesioned rats resulted in no significant behavioral or anatomical changes. Together, these results suggest that although behavioral experience can enhance neural growth after brain injury, the region surrounding the injury may be vulnerable to behavioral pressure during the early postlesion period.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.16-15-04776.1996

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Kozlowski, D. A., James, D. C., & Schallert, T.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1996-08-01
Volume
16
Issue
15
Pages
4776-4786
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2159053023
Cited by
389
References
45
FWCI
20.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use-Dependent Exaggeration of Neuronal Injury after Unilateral Sensorimotor Cortex Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.16-15-04776.1996
The paper
Kozlowski, D. A., James, D. C., & Schallert, T. (1996). Use-Dependent Exaggeration of Neuronal Injury after Unilateral Sensorimotor Cortex Lesions. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.16-15-04776.1996

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.